Balistic Pendulum Velocity Approximation Formula Explanation and Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oldblood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the velocity of a projectile impacting a ballistic pendulum using conservation laws. The key equations involve conservation of momentum and energy, leading to the relationship v = x*sqrt(g/L)(M+m)/m, where L is the pendulum string length, g is gravitational acceleration, and x is the pendulum's maximum horizontal amplitude. The user attempts to express the height h in terms of x, using circular motion principles to find h = sqrt(L^2 - x^2) + L. There is uncertainty about the correctness of this approach and whether it leads to the desired approximation. Clarification on the definition and function of a ballistic pendulum is also sought.
Oldblood
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the velocity of a projectile with mass m that hits a balistic pendulum with mass M can be written as v= x*sqrt(g/L)(M+m)/m

L is the length of the sting on the pendulum and g acceleration due to gravity. x is the maximum horizontal amplitude of the pendulum. The "=" is an approximation

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum
Conservation of energy

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have found:
mv=(m+M)V (conservation of momentum)

0.5(M+m)V^2 = (M+m)gh (conservation of energy)

=> V=sqrt (gh) => v= sqrt(2gh)(M+m)^2/m

V is velocity of the projectile and pendulum after the collision and h is the maximum height of the pendulum.

So it looks like I have to find h in therms of x. In my attempt using the equation of a circle i found that h= sqrt (L^2-x^2)+L

then substituting h with the x therm. Would that give me the correct answer? And I don't see how to go from here to get the approximation they want me to show
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is a balistic pendulum?
 
I tried it using angular frequency since frequency is 1/time and x/time = velocity. It seems to work but I don't know if that's the right approach. Does anyone know if that's correct or if that's possible.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top