Ball caught in a stream of air

In summary, the conversation discusses the effects of air flow on a ball suspended in a stream of air. The Coanda effect and Bernoulli's principle are mentioned as potential explanations for the ball remaining centered in the air stream. The Coanda effect may cause the ball to be pulled diagonally upward, while Bernoulli's principle draws it back horizontally. The videos and pictures provided show the oscillating movements of the ball, which could be caused by both effects. The question of which effect is dominant is raised, with the possibility that both are applicable.
  • #1
Femme_physics
Gold Member
2,550
1
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/3161/pressure1.jpg

Say I put my hand slightly above the middle of this air-flow producing machine that holds the ball up. Where would I "feel" it affecting more force on my hand, on the middle, or on the sides?

I'd imagine on the sides, right? Even though the air moves SLOWER on the sides, when I put my hand there, I'll feel more "force" applied on my hand, yes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The text in the drawing is misleading.

The air immediately next to the ball, left and right, where the lines are closer together, is moving faster and has lower pressure (that is what Bernoulli says and what feels a bit counter intuitive at first).

However, the air that is entirely outside the stream of air, left and right, is standing still and has normal pressure.
So only relatively speaking, does the still air completely outside the stream "move slower" and has higher pressure.
That is, the pressure is only higher than the pressure in the compressed stream of air.

If you put your hand in the stream, you'll mostly be feeling the force of the upward streaming air.
The speed of that streaming air is highest immediately left and right of the ball.
However, this is not the "pressure" that keeps the ball in place.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I question the pressure oriented explanations for why the ball remains centered in an upstream of air. It think it's more likely that wake deflection related to Coanda effect is the reason the ball remains centered in an air stream. If the ball gets off center, the air flow on the "inside" surface of the ball probably remains attached longer than the air flow on the "outside" of the ball , resulting in an net outwards wake deflection, causing the ball to recenter itself.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
rcgldr said:
I question the pressure oriented explanations for why the ball remains centered in an upstream of air. It think it's more likely that wake deflection related to Coanda effect is more likely the reason the ball remains centered in an air stream. If the ball gets off center, the air flow on the "inside" surface of the ball probably remains attached longer than the air flow on the "outside" of the ball , resulting in an net outwards wake deflection, causing the ball to recenter itself.

Interesting! :smile:

I didn't know this effect yet.
As I understand it, the difference would be that due to the Coandă effect the ball would be pulled diagonally upward, whereas Bernoulli would draw it back horizontally.

I would assume both effects are applicable.

Here's a video that we can use to analyze (Googled the title of this thread): :cool:
http://www.mindbites.com/lesson/4578-physics-in-action-ball-caught-in-a-stream-of-air

As it is, I'm not certain which effect is dominant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Btw, if I understand the Coandă effect correctly, it's still a difference in pressure caused by the Bernoulli's principle that causes the ball to be pulled back.
The difference in pressure is the mechanism by which the change in momentum is carried over.

The Coandă effect only predicts how the air changes its flow exactly when the ball is no longer centered.
And here's a picture! :smile:

explain.gif

And here's another picture:

angleOfAttack.jpg


In this picture you can see the Coandă effect at work in the middle picture, where despite the great angle of attack, the air is still flowing along the wing, letting Bernoulli do its work.

But if the angle of attack becomes too great (lower picture), Coandă does not do its job any more, so suddenly Bernoulli can not do its work any more either.
The result is that the plane suddenly loses its lift, resulting in WHOOAAAH! :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
rcgldr said:
I question the pressure oriented explanations for why the ball remains centered in an upstream of air. It think it's more likely that wake deflection related to Coanda effect is the reason the ball remains centered in an air stream.

I like Serena said:
As I understand it, the difference would be that due to the Coandă effect the ball would be pulled diagonally upward, whereas Bernoulli would draw it back horizontally. I would assume both effects are applicable.
In the videos the ball oscillates up and down and well as side to side, probably due to variations in the air flow, so it's stable but moves around a bit. Both effects could cause these movements.

My issue with the Bernoulli explanation is that the fastest moving and lowest pressure air flow is at the sides of the ball, while the slowest moving and highest pressure air is at the center (directly below) the ball (because the ball slows the air flow).

Any sideways movment of the ball corresponds to a difference in pressure and wake deflection in the opposite direction of the ball's movement (in order for momentum to be conserved). The question here is if Coanda effect, a difference in how long the flow remains attached on the upper portion of the ball, is the primary reason for the wake deflection and stablity.
 
Last edited:

1. How does the stream of air affect the trajectory of a ball caught in it?

When a ball is caught in a stream of air, it will experience a force called drag. This drag force opposes the motion of the ball and will cause it to slow down and change direction. The exact effect of the air stream on the ball's trajectory will depend on factors such as the speed and direction of the air stream, the size and shape of the ball, and the ball's initial velocity.

2. Why does a ball caught in a stream of air appear to float in mid-air?

When a ball is caught in a stream of air, the upward force of the air stream counteracts the downward force of gravity. This creates a state of equilibrium where the ball remains suspended in the air. The air stream essentially supports the weight of the ball, making it appear to float.

3. Can a ball caught in a stream of air change direction?

Yes, a ball caught in a stream of air can change direction. As mentioned earlier, the drag force caused by the air stream can alter the ball's trajectory. The direction of the air stream and the initial velocity of the ball will determine the extent of the change in direction.

4. What factors can affect the amount of drag force on a ball caught in a stream of air?

The amount of drag force on a ball caught in a stream of air can be affected by several factors. These include the speed and direction of the air stream, the size and shape of the ball, the surface roughness of the ball, and the density of the air. Generally, a faster and denser air stream will result in a higher drag force on the ball.

5. How does the rotation of a ball caught in a stream of air affect its motion?

The rotation of a ball caught in a stream of air can have a significant impact on its motion. The Magnus effect, which is the force that causes a spinning object to curve in the direction of its spin, can influence the ball's trajectory. This effect can be seen in sports such as baseball and tennis, where players use spin to control the direction of the ball.

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
695
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
347
Replies
207
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
877
Back
Top