Ball rolls without slipping in an accelerating car

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a bowling ball on a subway car that accelerates horizontally, the ball rolls without slipping due to the friction force acting on it. The friction generates a torque that influences the ball's acceleration, which must be related to the car's acceleration. The correct acceleration of the ball is determined to be 2a/7, while the initial reasoning led to an incorrect value of 5a/7. The solution involves applying the parallel axis theorem to find the moment of inertia about the point of contact and accounting for the fictitious force in the non-inertial frame of the accelerating car. Ultimately, the key to resolving the discrepancy lies in correctly relating the ball's acceleration to the car's acceleration by considering the inertial frame.
astrocytosis
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A bowling ball sits on the smooth floor of a subway car. If the car has a horizontal acceleration a, what is the acceleration of the ball? Assume that the ball rolls without slipping.

Homework Equations


torque = R x F = Iα
aball= Rα
Isphere = (2/5) MR2

The Attempt at a Solution


This seems like a simple problem but I'm struggling with it. If the ball is rolling without slipping, then there must be some friction force ƒ causing a torque on the ball equal to Rƒ = (2/5) MR2 * (aball/R). It's not on a ramp so the weight of the ball doesn't contribute to the torque. I guess I just can't figure out how to relate the acceleration of the car to all of this.

I had a thought that without friction, in the frame of the car, the ball would simply be accelerating at the same rate as the car, so the difference in acceleration must somehow be the result of friction. Friction here is ƒ = (2/5)Maball, so the difference in net force on the ball in the cases with and without friction is macar-maball=ƒ. But solving for the acceleration here does not get me the right answer so this reasoning must be flawed.

The correct answer according to the text is 2a/7. With my reasoning I get 5a/7.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The approach is good, you have two equations with two unknowns. Apparently something went wrong in the calculations you didn’t show.
 
Macar-Maball = (2/5) Maball

M (mass of ball) cancels

acar=aball + (2/5) aball = (7/5) aball

So aball = (5/7) acar.

Am I missing something in this equation?
 
You can get the answer by doing the problem correctly in the accelerated frame. In that frame, there is a fictitious force ##F=m_{ball}~a_{car}## acting in a direction opposite to the actual acceleration of the car. This force generates a torque ##\tau## about the point of contact P. Write the torque equation ##\tau = I_P~\alpha_{ball}## where ##I_P## is the moment of inertia about point P, not the center of the ball. Solve the equation and the correct answer will plop out.
 
By the parallel axis theorem, IP = (2/5)MR2 + MR2 = (7/5)MR2

Then the torque is (7/5)MR2 *(aball/R) = R*F = RMcar

I'm still getting aball = 5acar/7 when I solve this equation, though.
 
Don't forget that the aball calculated this way is in the accelerated non-inertial frame. What is it in the inertial frame of the track?
 
  • Like
Likes astrocytosis
Oh I see... I just have to subtract the acceleration of the car then. Thanks!
 
Back
Top