Ballistic Missile Defense: The $6 Billion Plan

AI Thread Summary
A proposed defense system aims to protect the United States from ballistic missile threats, including accidental launches and acts of terrorism. This concept is claimed to be more effective and cost-efficient than existing systems, with an estimated budget of $6 billion. The system is designed to neutralize a significant percentage of ballistic missiles, can be implemented within a few years, and utilizes existing technologies, making it smaller than current defense systems. The author seeks to engage with U.S. government officials to discuss the proposal further, emphasizing the potential for saving American lives during missile attacks. The discussion also includes skepticism and humor from other participants, questioning the feasibility and specifics of the proposed system.
timyoung
To Whom it May Concern:

I have a concept that outlines a defense system that would protect the United States from a high percentage of ballistic missiles, whether such an assault was caused by an accidental launch, an act of terrorism or war.

This concept is thought to be beyond what the United States has in the arena in terms of ballistic missile defense, such as the airborne laser, missile interceptors and etc.

An estimated cost of this system is placed at $6 billion; this makes the proposed system the cheapest to date and as my writing indicates the most powerful system to date, as a ballistic missile killer.

In addition it is believed that the proposed system will also have the following advantages:

· Its usage will render a great percentage of ballistic missiles inoffensive (restated due to importance).

· Because of the simplicity of the system its on-line date can be within a few years.

· The system can be built using existing technologies and capabilities that are within the grasp of United States.

· The entire system size is very small, when compared to other ballistic missile defense systems.


At this time I would like to establish a dialogue with anyone within the United States government, with the end result of presenting this concept to the appropriate persons within Washington DC. With this in mind, do you know anyone within the United States structure whom I could communicate to?

In closing, if a vast majority of American lives could be saved on the day(s) ballistic missiles (carrying nuclear warheads) are fired at this country, should not an inquiry be made as to the method which I propose?

Thank you for your time that was invested into reading this posting and for your assistance, which will hopefully be rendered in the future.


Timothy M. Young
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh yes...the Fermat of invention?

I have a wonderful proof of my last theorem, but I can't write it here :D
 
Would you mind please giving us the gist of it? Obviously any thing can be a matter of national security, but surely there must be something that you can say...
 
Having the privilege to have actually worked on NMD, I got to say, throw me a bone here. What's your big cost saver? No EKV? No upgraded GBR? You suggesting an entirely different method of rendering missles "inoffensive"?
 
I have been working with him...it is fairies with anti-ballistic pixie dust. Don't tell anyone!
 
Originally posted by Zero
I have been working with him...it is fairies with anti-ballistic pixie dust. Don't tell anyone!
Thats nothing, I can glare at them and make them fall out of the sky.
 
The only logical solution is orbiting nuclear weapons.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Back
Top