MHB How Did They Derive the Expression for P(Exactly One Match)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how the expression for P(exactly one match) was derived. One participant suggests a straightforward approach by defining events A, B, and C for matching colors in specific boxes, calculating P(exactly one match) as P(A) + P(B) + P(C) = 1/2. Another participant acknowledges that this method is valid but seeks clarification on the original derivation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in probability expressions and invites further explanation. The inquiry remains open for additional insights on the derivation process.
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, really simple question but...

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/5447/ballsra.jpg

I'm not quite sure on how they ended up with the expression for P(exactly one match). I would have done it in a more straight forward way, simply define A: matching the colour red in the red box only. B: matching the colour blue in the blue box only and C: matching the colour white in the white box only.

So P(exactly one match) = P(A)+P(B)+P(C) = \frac{3}{6} = \frac{1}{2}

How exactly did they get their expression?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
So P(exactly one match) = P(A)+P(B)+P(C) = \frac{3}{6} = \frac{1}{2}
Yes, this also works.

Usagi said:
How exactly did they get their expression?
See https://driven2services.com/staging/mh/index.php?threads/788/.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top