I already know how to prove that if [tex]M[/tex] is a compact metric space, then(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

C(M) = \{f\in \mathbb{C}^M\;|\; f\;\textrm{continuous}\}

[/tex]

with the sup-norm, is a Banach space, but now I encountered a claim, that actually metric is not necessary, and [tex]C(X)[/tex] is Banach space also when [tex]X[/tex] is a compact Hausdorff space.

My proof concerning [tex]C(M)[/tex] follows the following steps:

(1) Show that [tex]C(M)[/tex] is a norm space.

Let [tex]f_1,f_2,f_3,\cdots\in C(M)[/tex] be some Cauchy-sequence.

(2) Show that a pointwise limit [tex]f=\lim_{n\to\infty}f_n[/tex] exists in [tex]\mathbb{C}^M[/tex].

(3) Show that [tex]f[/tex] is continuous.

(4) Show that [tex]\|f-f_n\|\to 0[/tex] when [tex]n\to\infty[/tex].

All other steps work without metric, except the third one. This is how I did it:

Let [tex]x\in M[/tex] and [tex]\epsilon >0[/tex] be arbitrary. One has to find [tex]\delta >0[/tex] so that [tex]f(B(x,\delta))\subset B(f(x),\epsilon)[/tex]. First fix [tex]N\in\mathbb{N}[/tex] so that [tex]\|f_i-f_j\| < \epsilon / 3[/tex] for all [tex]i,j\geq N[/tex]. Then fix [tex]\delta > 0[/tex] so that [tex]f_N(B(x,\delta))\subset B(f_N(x),\epsilon /3)[/tex]. Then for all [tex]y\in B(x,\delta)[/tex]

[tex]

|f(x) - f(y)| \leq |f(x) - f_N(x)| \;+\; |f_N(x) - f_N(y)| \;+\; |f_N(y) - f(y)| < \epsilon

[/tex]

But how do you the same without the metric, with the Hausdorff property only?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Banach space C(X)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Banach space | Date |
---|---|

I Coordinate systems vs. Euclidean space | Dec 4, 2017 |

I Definition of tangent space: why germs? | Oct 2, 2017 |

Problem on seperable banach spaces | Jul 19, 2009 |

Matrix Banach Space | Jul 13, 2009 |

Banach Space that is NOT Hilbert | Oct 2, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**