Banked curve angle w/no friction - teacher's work differs

AI Thread Summary
To determine the appropriate banking angle for a curve with a 50m radius allowing cars to navigate at 12 m/s without friction, the centripetal force must be derived from the normal force. The initial calculations suggest an angle of 17.09 degrees, based on the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration. However, discrepancies arise when comparing this to a professor's calculation of 16.37 degrees, which uses a different approach involving tangent functions. Clarification is needed on the axes used in the problem, particularly regarding the direction of gravity and the normal force. A revised diagram and understanding of the forces involved are recommended for accurate calculations.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



At what angle should the roadway on a curve with a 50m radius be banked to allow cars to make the curve at 12 m/s even if friction is 0?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



All of the centripetal acceleration comes from normal force from the road on the car.

I choose to represent the road as being along the y-axis and Fn as being along +x axis. Then gravity is directed at angle theta to the left of the -yaxis.

Normal force must equal the component of gravity along -xaxis, which is mgsin(theta),

Since the required centripetal force is mv^2/r, this is 2.88m, mgsin(theta) = 2.88m

gsin(theta) = 2.88

theta = 17.09

My professors work seems to be similar, but at the end she says that:
gtan(theta) = 2.88

theta = 16.37

why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to check I understand your axes correctly: so the instantaneous velocity of the car is in the z-direction? And the y-direction is like the direction a pedestrian would walk along to cross the road as quick as possible? And the x-direction is the direction of the normal force?

In this case, gravity will not be directed at angle theta from the y-axis. And the normal force should not equal the component of gravity along the x-axis. I think you should draw the diagram again. I would advise making one of the axis go opposite to the direction of gravity. (Although your method should work too, but I think it makes it a bit more complicated).
 
1MileCrash said:

The Attempt at a Solution



All of the centripetal acceleration comes from normal force from the road on the car.

I choose to represent the road as being along the y-axis and Fn as being along +x axis. Then gravity is directed at angle theta to the left of the -yaxis.

Normal force must equal the component of gravity along -xaxis, which is mgsin(theta),

Since the required centripetal force is mv^2/r, this is 2.88m, mgsin(theta) = 2.88m


You calculated N instead of the centripetal force, which is Nsin(phi). The angle gravity encloses with the negative x-axis is not the banking angle. It is phi in the figure.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • roadb.JPG
    roadb.JPG
    6.9 KB · Views: 523
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top