Banked Curve Without Friction: Calculating Height at Increased Velocity

AI Thread Summary
A car is traveling on a frictionless, banked circular track with an inner radius of 397 meters and an inclination angle of 13 degrees. When the car's velocity is increased by a factor of 1.9, the new height above the ground can be calculated using trigonometric principles. The initial velocity calculation yields approximately 29.99 m/s, and the new radius is determined based on the increased speed. The vertical height is found by multiplying the new radius by the tangent of the inclination angle, resulting in a height of 239.22 meters. This approach effectively combines physics and trigonometry to solve the problem.
eestep
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car is traveling around a circular, banked track without friction. It is initially traveling around bottom of ramp where inner radius of track is 397 meters. Car then increases its velocity by a factor of 1.9. If inclination angle is 13 degrees, what is height (vertical distance above ground) car is traveling at this new velocity? Answer is 239.22 meters.

Homework Equations


v=\sqrt{}Rgtan\theta

The Attempt at a Solution


v=\sqrt{}(397)(9.81)tan(13)=29.99
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have correctly calculated the velocity of the car initially at the bottom of the ramp.
Now increase that velocity by a factor of 1.9 and calculate the new value of r, using your formula. This will tell you, by trigonometry, how far up the slope the car needs to be.
[are you certain the increase is "a factor of 1.9", it seems a lot; almost double]
 
After calculating R, do I determine height by multiplying it times tan(13)? I am certain but am getting 330.96.
 
Yes. The vertical height up the slope is x tan 13
where x is the increase in the radius.
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top