Banked Curves and Static Frictional Components

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of tire friction in banked curves. It clarifies that while the part of the tire in contact with the ground is relatively stationary, the friction acts in both tangential and vertical directions. When a car moves in a circle at constant speed, the tangential component of static friction is zero, as there is no acceleration in that direction. This understanding is crucial for calculating centripetal acceleration and friction forces in circular motion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the different components of friction when analyzing vehicle dynamics.
Starwing123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The part of the tire on the ground of a moving car is relatively stationary compared to the ground, right? The way the wheels work is the friction parallel to the direction of movement right? So when we calculate centripetal acceleration for cars going in a circle and the friction forces, why do we not have two components of friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Starwing123 said:
The part of the tire on the ground of a moving car is relatively stationary compared to the ground, right? The way the wheels work is the friction parallel to the direction of movement right? So when we calculate centripetal acceleration for cars going in a circle and the friction forces, why do we not have two components of friction?

The blue sentence is not true. When the car travels along a circle, the friction can act against slipping both in tangential direction, along the circle, and also up or down along the slope, although the tangential component of static friction is zero when the car moves with uniform speed.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Oh, Thanks! I didn't realize that the tangential friction is 0 b/c the car is moving at a constant speed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top