Basic Conversion from Translational Motion Equation

TrueBlood
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Studying for the MCAT, and trying to figure out how t = sqrt(2h/g) and t = Vo*sqrt(2h/g) is derived from the standard translational motion equations.

h = change in h
t = change in t

thus...

h = Vot + 1/2g(t)^2
h - Vot = 1/2g(t)^2
(2h)/g - (2Vot)/g =t^2
sqrt(2h/g) - sqrt(2Vot)/g = t

Obviously, I don't know how to simplify it further.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TrueBlood said:
Studying for the MCAT, and trying to figure out how t = sqrt(2h/g) and t = Vo*sqrt(2h/g) is derived from the standard translational motion equations.
Those equations cannot both be correct--they have different dimensions!

Only the first is correct, and only when Vo = 0.
 
TrueBlood said:
h = Vot + 1/2g(t)^2
h - Vot = 1/2g(t)^2
(2h)/g - (2Vot)/g =t^2
sqrt(2h/g) - sqrt(2Vot)/g = t
Also realize that your last step is mathematically incorrect:

\sqrt{a^2 - b^2} \ne a - b

For example sqrt(5^2 - 3^2) = sqrt(16) = 4 ≠ 5 - 3
 
The last step, mathematically correct, would be...

sqrt[(2h-2Vot)/g] = t

and in a free-fall equation, where Vo = 0, then t = sqrt(2h/g)

I found out t = Vo*sqrt(2h/g) when you are trying to find the range (r = Vot) and using t = sqrt(2h/g) when you don't have t.
Thx.
 
TrueBlood said:
The last step, mathematically correct, would be...

sqrt[(2h-2Vot)/g] = t

and in a free-fall equation, where Vo = 0, then t = sqrt(2h/g)
Good.

I found out t = Vo*sqrt(2h/g) when you are trying to find the range (r = Vot) and using t = sqrt(2h/g) when you don't have t.
Careful. That equation as written makes no sense. You probably meant to use r instead of t. And t = sqrt(2h/g) would only be half the time for the full trajectory.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top