Basic Diode Analysis Homework: Qs on V Drop & Forward Voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tekneek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Diode
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around basic diode analysis in the context of homework questions related to voltage drops across diodes and resistors in circuit configurations. Participants explore concepts of nodal analysis, forward and reverse bias conditions, and the implications of these conditions on voltage and current calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants question whether the voltage drop V is across the diode or the resistor in a given circuit configuration.
  • Some participants clarify that the voltage drop is the potential at the terminal with respect to the reference node, which is not explicitly shown.
  • There is confusion regarding the nodal analysis equation, particularly the term (V-0.7)/100 ohms, with participants debating whether it should represent the voltage across both the diode and the resistor.
  • One participant suggests that the diode drop can be treated as a voltage source of 0.7 V, leading to the conclusion that the voltage drop across the resistor is V - 0.7.
  • Discussion includes the rearrangement of components in a series circuit and its effect on the potential difference measurement.
  • Participants explore the scenario of a reverse-biased diode, questioning the voltage across it and whether it would be 0.7 volts or zero.
  • Some participants assert that a reverse-biased diode behaves like an open circuit, leading to the entire voltage drop occurring across it.
  • Equations are presented to illustrate the voltage across a reverse-biased diode, with differing interpretations of the voltage sign based on the chosen reference direction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the concepts discussed, particularly regarding the nodal analysis and the behavior of diodes under different biasing conditions. No consensus is reached on the interpretation of voltage across the diode in reverse bias.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding circuit configurations and reference nodes are not explicitly stated, which may lead to different interpretations of voltage drops and current calculations. The discussion also highlights the importance of defining terms and conditions clearly in circuit analysis.

Tekneek
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



First question,
In the picture attached (One diode and Resistor), when you are calculating V, is the V drop across the diode or the resistor?

Second Question,
In the second picture (circuit with current source) Why is the nodal analysis equation,
1A=V/100ohms + (V-0.7)/100ohms

Forward voltage drop = 0.7, V is voltage at the node in the middle.

The part I don't get is the (V-0.7)/100ohms, why are we taking the voltage across the diode then dividing by the resistor? Shouldn't it be voltage across both the diode and the resistor?

This forward voltage drop stuff is really confusing me..
 

Attachments

  • circ1.JPG
    circ1.JPG
    2 KB · Views: 496
  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    7.8 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Tekneek said:

Homework Statement



First question,
In the picture attached (One diode and Resistor), when you are calculating V, is the V drop across the diode or the resistor?
Neither, really. It's the potential at the terminal with respect to the circuit's reference node. In this case the reference node is implied and not shown explicitly. Note that there are two voltage sources, +5 V and - 5 V, which are indicated. These have an implied common reference point. If you want you can sketch in the voltage sources and the common reference to make it clear:

attachment.php?attachmentid=68355&stc=1&d=1396742587.gif


Second Question,
In the second picture (circuit with current source) Why is the nodal analysis equation,
1A=V/100ohms + (V-0.7)/100ohms

Forward voltage drop = 0.7, V is voltage at the node in the middle.

The part I don't get is the (V-0.7)/100ohms, why are we taking the voltage across the diode then dividing by the resistor? Shouldn't it be voltage across both the diode and the resistor?

This forward voltage drop stuff is really confusing me..

For nodal analysis the idea is to treat a series branch as a whole and find the net potential difference across the resistive part and divide by that resistance to determine the current. The diode drop, if the diode is forward biased, can be treated as a voltages source of 0.7 V. That makes the voltage drop across the resistor V - 0.7.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    3.5 KB · Views: 621
gneill said:
For nodal analysis the idea is to treat a series branch as a whole and find the net potential difference across the resistive part and divide by that resistance to determine the current. The diode drop, if the diode is forward biased, can be treated as a voltages source of 0.7 V. That makes the voltage drop across the resistor V - 0.7.

So the resistor does not have to be in the middle of potential difference you are trying to measure? and the equation really is V-0.7-0/100ohms ?
 
Tekneek said:
So the resistor does not have to be in the middle of potential difference you are trying to measure? and the equation really is V-0.7-0/100ohms ?

You can rearrange the order of the components in a series circuit (a branch) any way at all and won't change the result. After all, the potential changes are summed, and it doesn't matter in what order a sum is performed.

Yes, that really is the equation :smile:
 
gneill said:
You can rearrange the order of the components in a series circuit (a branch) any way at all and won't change the result. After all, the potential changes are summed, and it doesn't matter in what order a sum is performed.

Yes, that really is the equation :smile:
I never had this kind of problem before so this was confusing. So just to make sure, let's say for this circuit,

10s946b.jpg


The equation for current is I = (10-0.7-0)/(2.7Kohms), assuming the diode is 0.7volts forward biased.
 
Tekneek said:
I never had this kind of problem before so this was confusing. So just to make sure, let's say for this circuit,

10s946b.jpg


The equation for current is I = (10-0.7-0)/(2.7Kohms), assuming the diode is 0.7volts forward biased.

Yup!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
thnx that clears it up :)
 
gneill said:
Yup!

Another question about the same circuit, what if the diode was reverse biased? I know the current will be zero since there won't be any flow of current, but what about voltage across the diode? Will it be 0.7 volts or zero too?
 
Tekneek said:
Another question about the same circuit, what if the diode was reverse biased? I know the current will be zero since there won't be any flow of current, but what about voltage across the diode? Will it be 0.7 volts or zero too?

A reverse biased diode is, essentially, equivalent to an open circuit (or at least a very, very, high resistance). As such, essentially all the available potential drop will occur across it. So for example, if in our diagram the diode's polarity was reversed, the full 10V would present across it.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
A reverse biased diode is, essentially, equivalent to an open circuit (or at least a very, very, high resistance). As such, essentially all the available potential drop will occur across it. So for example, if in our diagram the diode's polarity was reversed, the full 10V would present across it.
So in terms of equations,
10-IR-Vd = 0
Vd = 10volts

or
since the polarity switched
10-IR+Vd = 0
Vd= -10
 
  • #11
Tekneek said:
So in terms of equations,
10-IR-Vd = 0
Vd = 10volts

or
since the polarity switched
10-IR+Vd = 0
Vd= -10

Sure, if you choose Vd to be defined as the cathode to anode potential for the diode.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K