Why Is the Dam Wall Area Constant in Fluid Pressure Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the application of fluid pressure calculations in a dam setting, specifically the equation δF = ρgy*δy. The confusion arises regarding why the area is considered constant while integrating the force on the dam wall, despite pressure changing with depth. It is clarified that pressure is defined as a function of depth, P(y) = ρg*y, and the differential force is derived by multiplying this pressure by an area element. The commutative property of multiplication allows for flexibility in the arrangement of terms, but using δF = ρg*dy*dy is incorrect. Ultimately, the explanation reinforces the correct approach to calculating force on a dam wall using fluid pressure principles.
Enzo
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Heya folks at Physics forums.

I'm having a bit of a problem with the theory of maths behind a simple formula used in F.M. This is purely a problem dealing with with mathematics rather than fluid dynamics. You'll have to excuse me, I really am a bit slow when it comes to these things, and right now I'm feeling like a complete idiot.


The situation is a basic dam setting. There's a dam wall, and one side of the dam is filled with water. The equation is used in finding the total force created by the water on dam wall.

δF = ρgy*δy

This equation stems from F=PA, where A=y*x, where x=1 in this scenario.
This is later on used with an integration to find the entire force on the dam wall:

(I'm using (S) as the integration sign)

F = ρg (S)y*δy, with the limits being the entire dam wall length in the y direction

What I don't understand is:
Why does the equation small change the length of the wall in respect to the area, rather than to small change the length down the wall in terms of pressure (eg, since pressure changes, why not small change the pressure and keep the dam wall area constant? which would give the equation: δF = ρgδy*y, then integrate that formula over the entire dam wall depth) I know that it would equal the same thing, but still..

Also, since the pressure on the wall changes according to depth, why isn't the depth in the pressure part small changing too? Eg, δF = ρgδy*δy

I apologize if this post is too basic(or stupid), but I'm a bit confused here. Anything you can say that would help me understand would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It might help if we first write the pressure as a function of the depth, y:

P(y) = rho*g*y

then to get the differential force, you need to multiply this pressure by an element of area,

dF = P(y) * dA = P(y)*1*dy = rho*g*y * dy

This gets your original form that you seemed to be questioning. As to whether you should write this as rho*g*y*dy or rho*g*dy*y, it really makes no difference since the multiplications are commutative.

I hope this same development also explains why it should not by rho*g*dy*dy; that would be completely wrong.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Back
Top