Basic kinematics: projectile motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a basic physics problem involving projectile motion, specifically calculating the height of a tabletop and the horizontal distance a book travels after sliding off. The initial calculations yielded a height of 0.502m and a horizontal distance of 0.448m, which did not match the book's answers of 1.13m and 0.502m, respectively. A participant identified an error in the velocity component calculations, clarifying that the correct vertical final velocity should be -3.136m/s. After acknowledging the mistake, the consensus was that the calculated height of 0.5m was accurate. The thread highlights the importance of careful attention to detail in physics problems to avoid discrepancies in results.
Ryaners
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
This is a really basic problem but the answers I've gotten don't match up with the back of the book. I've been over it several times & can't understand where I'm going wrong - any pointers would be much appreciated!

1. Homework Statement

A physics book slides off a horizontal tabletop with a speed of 1.40m/s. It strikes the floor in 0.320s. Ignore air resistance. Find a) the height of the tabletop off the floor; b) the horizontal distance from the edge of the table to the point where the book strikes the floor.

Homework Equations


vf = vi + at
x = xi + vit + ½at2

The Attempt at a Solution


I broke up the book's initial velocity into components:
Vf-x = Vi-x = 1.40m/s
Vf-y = Vi-y +at = -gt = -3.14m/s

The height of the table = the magnitude of the vertical displacement y (using the top of the table as the origin):
y = yi + Vi-yt + ½at2 = 0 + 0 + ½(-9.8m/s2)(0.320s)2= -0.502m -> height = 0.502m
What the book gives for this is 1.13m.

The horizontal distance = magnitude of horizontal displacement x:
x = xi + Vi-xt + ½at2 = 0 + (1.40m/s)(0.320s) + 0 = 0.448m
What the book gives here is 0.502m (which is what I got for the height - which means I'm either completely mixed up or maybe the book is wrong?!)

Thanks for taking a look.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get vfy=-4.9m/s? Looks like you used t=.5s, which, as it happens, would give a height closer to 1.1m.
 
haruspex said:
How did you get vfy=-4.9m/s? Looks like you used t=.5s, which, as it happens, would give a height closer to 1.1m.
Yes, you're right, sorry! I've been trying other problems since getting stuck on this one & copied the wrong figure down from my rough work. It should be Vf-y = -3.136m/s

I'll edit that now.
 
Ryaners said:
Yes, you're right, sorry! I've been trying other problems since getting stuck on this one & copied the wrong figure down from my rough work. It should be Vf-y = -3.136m/s

I'll edit that now.
Then I agree with your 0.5m height.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryaners
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top