Basic math problem ending in debate.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roscopcoletra
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 48/2(9+3) has sparked debate over its ambiguity due to differing interpretations of order of operations. Some argue that the lack of clear parentheses makes the equation poorly written, leading to confusion. The primary contention lies in whether to interpret it as 48 divided by 2 times the sum of 9 and 3, or to resolve the multiplication before division. This discussion highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions to avoid misinterpretation. The debate underscores the need for precise notation in mathematics.
Roscopcoletra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is this equation ambiguous? 48/2(9+3)=?

Some people are claiming that it is poorly written, and as a result, ambiguous.

Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top