Basic Pendulums Period^2 vs distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saristine
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a classroom experiment measuring the period of pendulums of varying lengths, resulting in a slope of 3.974 s^2/m when plotting the squared period against distance. Participants maintained angles under 15 degrees and were tasked with identifying a constant related to this slope. A user suggested referencing the Wikipedia page on the period of a simple pendulum, highlighting that squaring the equation yields a relationship between the period and length. The conversation emphasizes understanding the theoretical constant and comparing it to the measured slope from the experiment. Clarifying this relationship is essential for grasping the underlying physics of pendulum motion.
Saristine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In class we tested the period of different lengths of pendulums. When we squared the period and graphed it against the distance it caused a slope of 3.974 s^2/m. We kept the angles under 15 degrees. We were told that this is close to a constant and asked to figure out what that constant is and what it means, but i can not for the life of me find it in our textbook or on the internet.
Thanks in advance.

--Saristine
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Saristine said:
In class we tested the period of different lengths of pendulums. When we squared the period and graphed it against the distance it caused a slope of 3.974 s^2/m. We kept the angles under 15 degrees. We were told that this is close to a constant and asked to figure out what that constant is and what it means, but i can not for the life of me find it in our textbook or on the internet.
Thanks in advance.

--Saristine

I just Googled "period of simple pendulum" and immediately came upon this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum#Period_of_oscillation

Equation 1 tells you everything you need. (By the way, I find it hard to believe this wouldn't have been covered in your class.) What happens if you square both sides of the equation? You end up with something in the form:

T2 = const. * L

What is the constant supposed to be according to the formula? How does this compare to your measured slope?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top