Basic Proof Writing: Prove Sum of 3 Odd Ints is Odd

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keen94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sum of three odd integers is odd. The proof begins by defining odd integers and expressing them in the form 2a + 1. Participants suggest simplifying the notation used in the proof, recommending the use of x, y, and z instead of summation notation for clarity. Feedback emphasizes reducing formalism while maintaining the proof's integrity. The conversation concludes with a question about whether to create new threads for future inquiries, with a consensus on starting new threads for each question.
Keen94
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Given a series of mathematical statements, some of which are true and some of which are false. Prove those of which are true, and disprove those which are false.
1. The sum of three odd integers is odd.
Text: Principles of Mathematics by Allendoefer and Oakley.

Homework Equations


x(px→qx)↔P⊆Q
Law of Detachment and Law of Substitution.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am mainly looking for feedback on my notation (formalism). What is the proper way of writing out a proper basic proof?
Statement: The sum of three odd integers is odd.
x(integers): If x is odd, then ∑3i=1xi is odd.
(1) Assume x1, x2, and x3 is odd. [Hypothesis]
(2) The integers a, b, and c exist such that x1=2a+1, x2=2b+1, and x3=2c+1. [Defn of odd]
(3) ∑3i=1xi =(2a+1)+(2b+1)+(2c+1)
=2a+1+2b+1+2c+1
=2a+2b+2c+2+1
=2(a+b+c+1)+1
=2(m)+1[Let m=a+b+c+1]
Therefore the sum of three odd integers is odd by definition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keen94 said:

Homework Statement


Given a series of mathematical statements, some of which are true and some of which are false. Prove those of which are true, and disprove those which are false.
1. The sum of three odd integers is odd.
Text: Principles of Mathematics by Allendoefer and Oakley.

Homework Equations


x(px→qx)↔P⊆Q
Law of Detachment and Law of Substitution.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am mainly looking for feedback on my notation (formalism). What is the proper way of writing out a proper basic proof?
Statement: The sum of three odd integers is odd.
x(integers): If x is odd, then ∑3i=1xi is odd.
Not wrong, but writing ##\sum_{i = 1}^3 x_i## seems like overkill here. Just let x, y, and z be the odd integers. Their sum is x + y + z.

Keen94 said:
(1) Assume x1, x2, and x3 is odd. [Hypothesis]
(2) The integers a, b, and c exist such that x1=2a+1, x2=2b+1, and x3=2c+1. [Defn of odd]
(3) ∑3i=1xi =(2a+1)+(2b+1)+(2c+1)
=2a+1+2b+1+2c+1
=2a+2b+2c+2+1
=2(a+b+c+1)+1
=2(m)+1[Let m=a+b+c+1]
Therefore the sum of three odd integers is odd by definition.
The gist of your proof is fine, but you're using something that is in my opinion unnecessary (the summation and subscripted variables).
 
Thank for replying Mark44 and taking the time to help me. Would the following adjustment make the proof less overkill?

Statement: The sum of three odd integers is odd.
xyz(integers): If x, y, and z are odd, then x+y+z is odd.
(1) Assume x, y, and z are odd [Hypothesis]
(2) The integers a, b, and c exist such that x=2a+1, y=2b+1, and z=2c+1. [Defn of odd]
(3) x+y+z =(2a+1)+(2b+1)+(2c+1)
=2a+1+2b+1+2c+1
= 2a+2b+2c+2+1
=2(a+b+c+1)+1
=2(m)+1 [Defn of odd]
Therefore x+y+z is odd by definition of odd.
 
That looks good. The only think I would add is that it wouldn't hurt (IMO) to reduce the formalism a bit more in your statement of the problem. Instead of saying "∀x∀y∀z(integers): If x, y, and z are odd, then x+y+z is odd," you could say the same thing as "For any integers x, y, and z, x + y + z is odd." All the rest looks fine.
 
Mark44 said:
That looks good. The only think I would add is that it wouldn't hurt (IMO) to reduce the formalism a bit more in your statement of the problem. Instead of saying "∀x∀y∀z(integers): If x, y, and z are odd, then x+y+z is odd," you could say the same thing as "For any integers x, y, and z, x + y + z is odd." All the rest looks fine.
Thanks for the feed back Mark44. Going forward I will have more questions about this topic. Should I keep creating new threads, as in a new thread per question or just keep everything under one thread? Thanks.
 
Keen94 said:
Thanks for the feed back Mark44. Going forward I will have more questions about this topic. Should I keep creating new threads, as in a new thread per question or just keep everything under one thread? Thanks.
New question -- new thread.
 
Gotcha, see you there haha.
 
Back
Top