Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 Under Given Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter fmilano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
AI Thread Summary
To prove that b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 under the specified conditions, it is established that b_m is the maximum of the b_i values, which are constrained between 0 and 1, and their sum equals 1. The inequality ∑b_i^2 ≤ ∑b_i = 1 holds true since each b_i^2 is less than or equal to b_i. This leads to the conclusion that b_m, being the maximum value, must be greater than or equal to the sum of the squares of the b_i values. Thus, the desired inequality b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 is supported by these conditions.
fmilano
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to show this:

b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2

given these three conditions:

b_m \geq b_i, for i=1..n (in other words b_m = max(b_i)) and

0 \leq b_i \leq 1 for i=1..n and

\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1

I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated

(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).

Thanks,

Federico
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help . . .

0 \leq b_{i}^2 \leq b_i \leq 1, this implies that \sum_{i = 1}^n b_{i}^2 \leq \sum_{i = 1}^n b_i = 1.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top