Basics of pressure and pascal's principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how pressure, depth, and height affect force in fluids, specifically through Pascal's principle. The original poster seeks clarification on whether increasing volume and height in a fluid leads to greater force generation at deeper levels. They suggest that an initial input force can multiply due to these factors, resulting in a greater output force at increased depths. A participant questions the specifics of the fluid's containment, indicating that the setup may influence how force is transmitted. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the underlying principles of fluid mechanics in understanding these dynamics.
johndb
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I've being studying fluids and pressure, but want to clarify something. Take a rough example of a force applied on a fluid/gas is it correct to say that from 'P + pgh' one can say that as the volume and height increases or with these increasing layers there is more force been 'packed' behind /generated with the greater depth and from the receiving end a greater output in terms of force with each increase of depth directly vertically below the applied force (ignoring where pressure gauges often channel forces horizontally away and then opposite in direction up an exit pipe which balances forces, e.g. barometer or manometer). In a sense can I say that because of depth, height and pressure an initial input force can increase/multiply because of these factors for a greater output force.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
johndb said:
I've being studying fluids and pressure, but want to clarify something. Take a rough example of a force applied on a fluid/gas is it correct to say that from 'P + pgh' one can say that as the volume and height increases or with these increasing layers there is more force been 'packed' behind /generated with the greater depth and from the receiving end a greater output in terms of force with each increase of depth directly vertically below the applied force (ignoring where pressure gauges often channel forces horizontally away and then opposite in direction up an exit pipe which balances forces). In a sense can I say that because of depth, height and pressure an initial input force can increase/multiply because of these factors for a greater output force.

I'm not clear as to what exactly you are asking. Is the fluid in a rigid container, a cylinder/piston assembly, or something else?

CS
 
Well I'm not fussy, can be any of those, (unless of course that changes how the the force is communicated through the fluid/gas) I'm concerned about the underlying principle.
 
johndb said:
Well I'm not fussy, can be any of those, (unless of course that changes how the the force is communicated through the fluid/gas) I'm concerned about the underlying principle.

Perhaps this will help:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/pasc.html

CS
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top