Bayesian stats: how to update probability?

AI Thread Summary
Bayesian methods are being applied to predict future data points using a normal probability density function (pdf) based on 75 previous data points. The initial calculations yield a maximum probability of 0.11 for a datapoint of 1.30, but this may underestimate future values. Incorporating the last two data points, which show an upward trend, suggests that nearby points can be weighted more heavily to improve predictions. However, a clear probability model and prior distributions must be established for effective Bayesian analysis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding data dependencies and the appropriateness of the chosen statistical approach.
ireland01
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am trying to use Bayesian methods (Bayes rule) to predict further datapoints (at point n,n+1,n+2 etc..)...

I begin by generating a normal pdf using previous 75 datapoints (prior: n-75 to n-1) with mean value, μ: 1.25 and standard deviation, δ: 3.67.

Note: previous datapoints range from -5 to +5 in value.

I calculate the maximum probabilty of 0.11 for datapoint = 1.30.

Using this will underestimate (predict) the value at n.

I now want to incorporate (into the probability) the fact that I know my previous two datapoints (n-2 to n-1) showed increase towards +ve...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can give your datapoints nearby a higher weight - there are many ways to do this, depending on the type of correlation between the points you expect.
 
ireland01 said:
I am trying to use Bayesian methods (Bayes rule) to predict further datapoints (at point n,n+1,n+2 etc..)...

.

You'll have to explain what probability model you are using and what prior distributions you are using before anyone can give you an answer. A Bayesian method has to be more than the willingness to update estimates. You must also be willing to assume a specific probability model and specific priors.

If this is a real world problem, describe it and someone might suggest a probability model.
 
The probability that your datapoint = 1.3 is zero.
This seems like a very strange thing to do. Are your data dependent in some way? If you're just sampling from a normal distributions, then your previous samples are irrelevant. Calculate your probability directly from the normal pdf.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top