Beam Splitter Physics: |45>,-|45> State Output

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Beam splitter
StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
If we have a beam splitter, and we fire two photons from either side towards it (both meeting and interfering at the same time):

If the state of the photon coming in from the left is |45>, and the one coming in from the right is -|45>, would the output be:

-i|45>(l)|45>(l) - i|45>(r)|45>(r) - i|45>(l)|i45>(r) - |45>(l)|45>(r)

Where the 3rd term is both reflected, the last term both transmitted, and the first two where they exit on the same side of the beam splitter output.

The attached image might give some clarity.
 

Attachments

  • CCI18082013.jpg
    CCI18082013.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 445
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you put the i in the middle of the ket for the third term?

If you include it and normalize, you will find that the third and fourth term have equal magnitude, but different sign. So they cancel out. As a consequence exactly identical and indistinguishable single photons entering different ports of a beam splitter will always leave as a pair of two photons via the same exit port. This is the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect.
 
Cthugha said:
Why did you put the i in the middle of the ket for the third term?

Because both reflected.
 
Oh, sorry. Maybe my post was not clear. I was rather puzzled why you wrote |i45> instead of i|45>.
 
Cthugha said:
Oh, sorry. Maybe my post was not clear. I was rather puzzled why you wrote |i45> instead of i|45>.

My bad! Thanks for spotting that out for me. Should be i|45>.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top