Becoming a scientific researcher

  • Thread starter Thread starter chez_butt23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientific
AI Thread Summary
To become a scientific researcher in paleontology, one must pursue a PhD in a relevant field, such as evolutionary biology. While it's early in the process, gaining exposure to the field through coursework and research opportunities is crucial for determining specific interests. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the realities of a research career, which may differ from popular portrayals in media. Recommended readings include "Advice to a Young Scientist" by P.B. Medawar and "Advice for a Young Investigator," which provide guidance for aspiring researchers. Engaging with these resources can help clarify the path toward a career in paleontology and scientific research.
chez_butt23
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I have wanted to be a paleontologist my entire life. I am currently a senior in high school, going to college as an evolutionary biology major next year. I know that I have plenty of time before I really have to worry about this, but how does one become a scientific researcher? Obviously I need to earn a PhD in my field, but I am not sure where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chez_butt23 said:
I have wanted to be a paleontologist my entire life. I am currently a senior in high school, going to college as an evolutionary biology major next year. I know that I have plenty of time before I really have to worry about this, but how does one become a scientific researcher? Obviously I need to earn a PhD in my field, but I am not sure where to go from there.

I know its early days, but do you have any idea of any specifics? It's ok if you don't since most people decide on specifics when they've had a decent amount of exposure to a particular area.

To be honest I'm pretty ignorant of your field. For all I know all the famous archeology type people are like Indiana Jones being a professor 9-5 monday to friday, and on the weekends discovering the holy grail and saving the world, but that's just me. [I'm certain its not as glamorous though ;)]
 
Try reading: Advice to a Young Scientist by P.B. Medawar
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
799
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top