Bernoulli Principle with Bullets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the application of Bernoulli's principle to long-range sniper bullets, particularly regarding the effects of gyroscopic spin and pressure differences. It highlights that while a bullet's spin stabilizes its trajectory, it does not create lift due to uniform circumferential velocity. The impact of crosswinds on bullet trajectory is acknowledged, emphasizing the role of spin in generating forces. Additionally, the conversation references Gerald Bull's innovative artillery design that reduced aerodynamic drag by filling the vacuum behind a shell, suggesting a similar approach could enhance sniper bullet performance. The potential for applying these aerodynamic principles to improve long-range shooting accuracy is noted.
sooty1892
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi
I was reading about long range sniper bullets been affected by gyroscopic affect with the spin of the bullet. I was wondering if Bernoulli's principle could be applied to this, as the pressure at one side of the bullet is greater than the other (depending on the rotation).
Is this true and if so, how can it be applied?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I always thought bullets used spin to generate angular momentum so that they stay going straight out of the muzzle (like how a bicycle is stabilized by the rotation of its wheels).
 
The spin of a bullet keeps it moving (nominally) straight. It does not provide any lift due to the fact that there is no circumferential velocity around the bullet except that induced by the spin, and the spin-induced velocity is the same everywhere.
 
To expand on what bonehead said, in practicality, there is almost always some crosswind component between the sniper and the target. And this WILL cause the bullet to produce a force, which is dependent on the bullets spin as well as the direction of the crosswind.
 
Modern long-range shells are bullet shaped too. The late Gerald Bull was an artillery designer reputedly assassinated by the Mossad for helping Saddam Husein make a supergun capable of reaching Israel from Iraq.

Prior to that work he developed an artillary shell which had a controlled burn of a propellant in the back. The purpose was not to propel the shell but to fill in the vacuum behind the shell as it flew. This one innovation cut the aerodynamic drag on the shell in half and doubled the range of the conventional artillery shell.

A long-range sniper bullet could be designed using this same principle.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top