Best Book to Learn Basics (between undergrad and grad)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for introductory books on particle physics, specifically for readers seeking material between undergraduate and graduate levels. Key suggestions include Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" and Halzen's "Quarks and Leptons," both recognized for their solid foundational content despite being around 20 years old. Concerns about the age of these texts are addressed, with participants noting that the fundamentals of the Standard Model have not significantly changed, making these books still relevant. A newer edition of Griffiths is mentioned, likely to include updated information on neutrinos, reflecting recent developments in the field. Additionally, "An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics" by Cottingham and Greenwood is recommended, particularly for its updated content on neutrino masses and mixing. Overall, while there is acknowledgment of advancements in areas like dark matter and quantum gravity, the consensus is that fundamental physics has remained relatively stable over the past few decades.
dbuzi123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

I'm very interested in learning about particle physics and am wondering which book you guys recommend as a starting point. I'm looking for something in between undergrad and grad. So far it seems like the two best choices are Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Paticles, and Halzen's Quarks and Leptons. The one thing I'm worried about though is that both of these books are 20 years old. Anybody have any insights?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Griffiths is a good book. I would think that many of the fundamentals [as one would expect from an "Introduction"] are the same from 20 years ago.
 
dbuzi123 said:
Hello All!

I'm very interested in learning about particle physics and am wondering which book you guys recommend as a starting point. I'm looking for something in between undergrad and grad. So far it seems like the two best choices are Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Paticles, and Halzen's Quarks and Leptons. The one thing I'm worried about though is that both of these books are 20 years old. Anybody have any insights?

Thanks!

A new edition of Griffiths is https://www.amazon.com/dp/3527406018/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

Since the Standard Model hasn't changed much in the interim, though, I think the two older books hold up fine.

I'd also recommend https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750308648/?tag=pfamazon01-20.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
robphy said:
Griffiths is a good book. I would think that many of the fundamentals [as one would expect from an "Introduction"] are the same from 20 years ago.

I suspect the new edition will contain much more about neutrinos, because a lot of neutrino stuff has happened in the last 20 years.

Another nice book at about this level is An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics by Cottingham and Greenwood. A second edition of this has just been released. New to this edition are Section 6.7 Dirac and Majorana fields, and three new chapters,

19 Neutrino masses and mixing 185
19.1 Neutrino masses 185
19.2 The weak currents 186
19.3 Neutrino oscillations 187
19.4 The MSW effect 190
19.5 Neutrino masses and the Standard Moael 191
19.6 Parameterisation of U 191
19.7 Lepton number conservation 192
19.8 Sterile neutrinos 193

20 Neutrino masses and mixing: experimental results 194
20.1 Introduction 194
20.2 K2K 196
20.3 Chooz 198
20.4 KamLAND 198
20.5 Atmospheric neutrinos 200
20.6 Solar neutrinos 200
20.7 Solar MSW effects 203
20.8 Future prospects 204

21 Majorana neutrinos 206
21.1 Majorana neutrino fields 206
21.2 Majorana Lagrangian density 207
21.3 Majorana field equations 208
21.4 Majorana neutrinos: mixing and oscillations 209
21.5 Parameterisation of U 210
21.6 Majorana neutrinos in the Standard Model 210
21.7 The seesaw mechanism 211
21.8 Are neutrinos Dirac or Majorana? 212
 
George Jones said:
19.8 Sterile neutrinos 193

Oh, the heartbreak.

Thanks for the info, George. I shouldn't have been so confident when saying nothing has changed.
 
Daverz said:
Oh, the heartbreak.

Thanks for the info, George. I shouldn't have been so confident when saying nothing has changed.

Actually, I think you're all too right.

Even though dark matter, dark enery, neutrino mass, and speculations on the nature of quantum gravity are all interesting, fundamental physics hasn't really advanced that much in the last thirty years.

For my money, the 25 year period during which physics advanced the most was 1905 - 1930.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top