Best Book to Learn Basics (between undergrad and grad)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on recommendations for introductory books on particle physics, specifically for readers seeking material between undergraduate and graduate levels. Key suggestions include Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" and Halzen's "Quarks and Leptons," both recognized for their solid foundational content despite being around 20 years old. Concerns about the age of these texts are addressed, with participants noting that the fundamentals of the Standard Model have not significantly changed, making these books still relevant. A newer edition of Griffiths is mentioned, likely to include updated information on neutrinos, reflecting recent developments in the field. Additionally, "An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics" by Cottingham and Greenwood is recommended, particularly for its updated content on neutrino masses and mixing. Overall, while there is acknowledgment of advancements in areas like dark matter and quantum gravity, the consensus is that fundamental physics has remained relatively stable over the past few decades.
dbuzi123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

I'm very interested in learning about particle physics and am wondering which book you guys recommend as a starting point. I'm looking for something in between undergrad and grad. So far it seems like the two best choices are Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Paticles, and Halzen's Quarks and Leptons. The one thing I'm worried about though is that both of these books are 20 years old. Anybody have any insights?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Griffiths is a good book. I would think that many of the fundamentals [as one would expect from an "Introduction"] are the same from 20 years ago.
 
dbuzi123 said:
Hello All!

I'm very interested in learning about particle physics and am wondering which book you guys recommend as a starting point. I'm looking for something in between undergrad and grad. So far it seems like the two best choices are Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Paticles, and Halzen's Quarks and Leptons. The one thing I'm worried about though is that both of these books are 20 years old. Anybody have any insights?

Thanks!

A new edition of Griffiths is https://www.amazon.com/dp/3527406018/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

Since the Standard Model hasn't changed much in the interim, though, I think the two older books hold up fine.

I'd also recommend https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750308648/?tag=pfamazon01-20.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
robphy said:
Griffiths is a good book. I would think that many of the fundamentals [as one would expect from an "Introduction"] are the same from 20 years ago.

I suspect the new edition will contain much more about neutrinos, because a lot of neutrino stuff has happened in the last 20 years.

Another nice book at about this level is An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics by Cottingham and Greenwood. A second edition of this has just been released. New to this edition are Section 6.7 Dirac and Majorana fields, and three new chapters,

19 Neutrino masses and mixing 185
19.1 Neutrino masses 185
19.2 The weak currents 186
19.3 Neutrino oscillations 187
19.4 The MSW effect 190
19.5 Neutrino masses and the Standard Moael 191
19.6 Parameterisation of U 191
19.7 Lepton number conservation 192
19.8 Sterile neutrinos 193

20 Neutrino masses and mixing: experimental results 194
20.1 Introduction 194
20.2 K2K 196
20.3 Chooz 198
20.4 KamLAND 198
20.5 Atmospheric neutrinos 200
20.6 Solar neutrinos 200
20.7 Solar MSW effects 203
20.8 Future prospects 204

21 Majorana neutrinos 206
21.1 Majorana neutrino fields 206
21.2 Majorana Lagrangian density 207
21.3 Majorana field equations 208
21.4 Majorana neutrinos: mixing and oscillations 209
21.5 Parameterisation of U 210
21.6 Majorana neutrinos in the Standard Model 210
21.7 The seesaw mechanism 211
21.8 Are neutrinos Dirac or Majorana? 212
 
George Jones said:
19.8 Sterile neutrinos 193

Oh, the heartbreak.

Thanks for the info, George. I shouldn't have been so confident when saying nothing has changed.
 
Daverz said:
Oh, the heartbreak.

Thanks for the info, George. I shouldn't have been so confident when saying nothing has changed.

Actually, I think you're all too right.

Even though dark matter, dark enery, neutrino mass, and speculations on the nature of quantum gravity are all interesting, fundamental physics hasn't really advanced that much in the last thirty years.

For my money, the 25 year period during which physics advanced the most was 1905 - 1930.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top