VertexOperator said:
I have learned most of calculus (it is a huge part of the school curriculum) so I will have a look at Spivak, I might like it more than Finney.
Why is real analysis a topic that is partially covered in most calculus textbooks? Why isn't there a separate book dedicated for analysis? Or is analysis a part of calculus?
There absolutely are textbooks dedicated to analysis. Calculus is actually a subset if mathematical analysis. One could say that calculus is analysis but without proofs.
To be able to start learning analysis, you need to have a good grasp on both calculus and proofs. The first thing you'll do in analysis will be to rigorously define and work out the calculus concepts. For example, you will rigorously define continuity and limits using \varepsilon-\delta definitions and you will prove
all the limit, derivative and integral identities you encountered in calculus.
After that, analysis deals with topics which are not covered in calculus anymore. For example, Fourier series, functional analysis, complex analysis, etc.
If you want separate books dedicated to analysis, then I would suggest
- Knapp: "Basic real analysis"
- Carothers: "Real analysis"
- Bridges: "Foundations of Real and Abstract Analysis"
- Berberian: "A First Course in Real Analysis"
- Apostol: "Mathemathical Analysis"
- Lang: "Undergraduate Analysis"
- Abbott: "Understanding Analysis"
Some of these books are more advanced than others. Finally there is of course also Baby Rudin, but I don't like it very much...