Best multiple/many individual MOSFET driver IC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter artis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ic Mosfet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting a suitable driver IC for controlling multiple IRF540 MOSFETs in a sequential lighting application. The user aims to switch on and off ten MOSFETs, ensuring that at least two are active simultaneously to create a seamless lighting effect. Recommendations include using an Arduino for control, incorporating level shifters, and considering the TPIC6B595 shift register for efficient driving of the MOSFETs. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the load specifications and the need for appropriate gate driving techniques to prevent overheating and ensure reliable operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MOSFET operation and specifications, particularly for IRF540.
  • Familiarity with Arduino programming and interfacing.
  • Knowledge of basic electronic components, including resistors and shift registers.
  • Experience with circuit design for low-voltage applications (12V DC).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Arduino programming for controlling multiple outputs and implementing sequential lighting patterns.
  • Learn about the TPIC6B595 shift register and its application in driving MOSFETs.
  • Explore MOSFET gate driving techniques to optimize switching performance and minimize heat dissipation.
  • Investigate the impact of load specifications on MOSFET selection and circuit design.
USEFUL FOR

Electronics hobbyists, engineers designing lighting control systems, and anyone interested in using MOSFETs for low-voltage applications.

  • #31
On the other hand, if current is flowing and it is used for control purposes, then switching off is no simple matter. In such case I would rather choose the limited reliability/lifetime.

I don't know what are you trying to do with relativity, but better do the math first because any (mechanically feasible) effect is usually too small to be measured.

I have a feeling that this won't end well. But please keep us updated anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I did not understand your concern Rive?
 
  • #33
Which one?

Regarding relativity, it is exactly as I said. The effects are usually too small (needs math to see how small) to be measured, and even attempts needs rigorous accuracy both in design and actual doing. Mechanical switching - well, no way accurate enough. But since I have very little information about what are you trying to do, I can't say much.

Regarding switching: mechanical switching is an art in itself.
As an example, see this or this.
Since you are trying to control a MOSFET directly, the dissipation will inevitably increase, but with the available information there is no way to give an estimate. You have to be careful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #34
MOSFETs do not mix with brush commutators without signal conditioning networks and bipolar gate-drivers having stable power supplies.

My concern is that artis is asking for technical advice on how to build a leaning-tower of left-overs, something that will continue to rise in height and complexity until it collapses under the number of components to be mounted, along with the profusion of electrical connections that will have to be made.

The KISS principle says, make it work now with the minimum, a commutator and the light globes is all that is needed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rbelli1 and Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K