Other Best Search Engines for Academic Papers - arXiv and Beyond

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of various search engines for academic papers, particularly in the field of physics. ArXiv is mentioned as a repository rather than a search engine, with participants noting its usefulness for specific subject searches. Google Scholar is highlighted as a primary tool for scholarly searches, praised for its ability to locate papers not only from arXiv but also from other sources. Users emphasize the importance of refining search terms to enhance search results. Additionally, the value of following citation trails is discussed, as it helps discover significant papers and authors in a given field. Tracking citations of one's own work is also mentioned as a way to stay informed about relevant research.
Thomaz
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
What are the best search engines of academic papers in your opinion?

as of right now I'm only searching on arXiv :(
 
  • Like
Likes Aufbauwerk 2045
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you heard of Google Scholar?

ArXiv is not a search engine. It is a repository.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes Thomaz
ZapperZ said:
Have you heard of Google Scholar?

ArXiv is not a search engine. It is a repository.

Zz.

I meant that when a need to search for a paper in a specific subject i search there :D

how good is google scholar? Any other better for physics?

thnks for your answer :)
 
Thomaz said:
I meant that when a need to search for a paper in a specific subject i search there :D

how good is google scholar? Any other better for physics?

thnks for your answer :)

Google Scholar will find anything at arXiv and often lots of papers that are not at arXiv. Like any search engine, how well it works depends on the search terms you use, and one needs to develop skill selecting and refining the search terms used in a given field and literature search.

Google Scholar is the first search engine I turn to for scholarly searches, and it is sufficient to get started most of the time, but there are occasions where I use the search features of specific repositories like DTIC or arXiv or even specific publishing organizations.

But skillful literature reviews often go beyond these kinds of searches. Most important papers I find are found by following the "paper trails" of other papers. Which papers are cited by important papers I've already found? Which papers later cite the important papers I've already found? What else on the subject has been written by authors who seem to be important and knowledgeable on the subject? Once I've published in a field, I also track who is citing MY papers. If someone thinks my paper is important enough to cite, odds are good they're bringing valuable new information both in their study itself and in the other papers they've cited and written.
 
  • Like
Likes Thomaz
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top