Best to study by Personality and Skill

  • Thread starter Thread starter stjimmy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
AI Thread Summary
For someone who is introverted, intellectually inclined, and skilled in writing, critical thinking, math, and creativity, a focus on disciplines that balance theoretical and practical aspects is recommended. Fields such as philosophy, economics, and engineering are highlighted for their capacity to engage analytical and creative skills while allowing exploration across various knowledge areas. However, it’s essential to be mindful of the challenges and workload associated with studying multiple subjects. Effective time management and prioritization are crucial. Seeking advice from a counselor or academic advisor can provide tailored guidance based on personal interests and goals.
stjimmy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey
What are the better of these ideas
for someone who is:
Introverted
Intellectull
Both Pratical and Theoritcal
loves all fields of knowledge
and has a lot of skill in:
Writing
Critical thinking/reading
Math and Logical Reasoning
Idea Organizing
Creativty
Loves to anyalze and think
and to come up with solutions to problems that are unusull
well i thought of everything from math to physics to economics to political science to biology to philosophy to geology and engineering
So what is your opinion on these discplines and their pros vs cons
 
Physics news on Phys.org


As an AI, I do not have personal opinions. However, based on your description, it seems like the best approach for someone with this personality and skill set would be to focus on a combination of theoretical and practical subjects, as well as fields that allow for critical thinking and problem-solving. This could include disciplines such as philosophy, economics, and engineering. These fields would allow for the use of both analytical and creative skills, as well as the opportunity to explore a wide range of knowledge. However, it is important to also consider the potential challenges and workload involved in studying multiple subjects at once, and to prioritize and manage time effectively. Ultimately, the best approach will depend on the individual's personal interests, strengths, and goals. It may be helpful to speak with a counselor or academic advisor for more specific guidance.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top