Beta-Decay Energy: Li-11 Q=20 MeV & Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter RESolo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
RESolo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have to work out which if these two beta-decay processes are energetically possible, given that the beta-decay energy of Li-11 is Q = 20 MeV. The two processes are:

(1)
〖Li〗_11→〖Be〗_9+2n
(2)
〖Li〗_11→〖He〗_3+〖He〗_8



I am supposed to use the energy conditions for beta-decay equations, i.e.:

Q={M(Z,A)-M(Z+1,A)-m_e } c^2
Q={M(Z,A)-M(Z-1,A)-m_e } c^2

But I don’t know which one; in the first process the numbers of neutrons and protons both decrease by one – how is this possible? (In the second process, the number of neutrons decreases by one and the number of protons increases by one, so I guess that is beta-minus).

Basically, I don’t understand how the decay process works, and from then how to calculate Q when there are two daughter nuclei. So an explanation would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But I don’t know which one; in the first process the numbers of neutrons and protons both decrease by one – how is this possible?
11=9+2, the total number of nucleons stays the same. As you get one new proton, the number of neutrons decreases by one.

Basically, I don’t understand how the decay process works, and from then how to calculate Q when there are two daughter nuclei.
Just add both nuclei.

This is energy conservation - the total available energy is given by the mass of ##{}^11Li##, and you have to check if that is sufficient to produce all daughter particles.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top