Beta Rad & Positron/Electron - Radioactive Decay

3trQN
Messages
337
Reaction score
1
During radioactive decay, what determines if the emission of a beta particle will be positronic or electronic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on which of the two final nuclei has a smaller mass than the initial nucleus. The mass difference provides the energy for the electron and antineutrino (or positron and neutrino).
 
For beta-minus decay the following condition must be fulfilled:
Q \approx [m_{at}(Z,A)-m_{at}(Z+1,A)]c^2 > 0

with
Q: Q-value
m_{at}(Z,A): mass of the atom before beta-minus decay
m_{at}(Z+1,A): mass of the atom after beta-minus decayFor beta-plus decay the following condition must be fulfilled:

Q \approx [m_{at}(Z,A)-m_{at}(Z-1,A)]c^2-1.022 \rm{MeV} > 0

with
Q: Q-value
m_{at}(Z,A): mass of the atom before beta-plus decay
m_{at}(Z-1,A): mass of the atom after beta-plus decay
1.022 \rm{MeV}: two times the electron (or positron) mass

Thus, for beta-plus decay the mass of the atom before decay
must be at least two electron masses greater than after the decay.
 
Last edited:
3trQN said:
During radioactive decay, what determines if the emission of a beta particle will be positronic or electronic?
The mass defect determines if a nuclei is radioactive, i.e. will decay spontaneously.

If one looks at a chart of the nuclides arranged with mass on the abscissa and nuclear charge (atomic number, Z) on the ordinate, then the positron emitters are above the stability line, while the beta emitters are below the stability line. The positron emitters have an excess of protons, while the beta emitters have an excess of neutrons, or conversely a deficiency of protons.

At a certain mass, the process (phenomenon) of electron capture (EC)becomes more likely than positron emission. In EC, an K-shell (1s) electron is 'captured' by the nucleus and a proton is transformed into a neutron. The effect is the same as positron emission - Z decreases by 1.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top