What are the errors in this complex number equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying errors in a complex number equation that incorrectly equates 4 to -4. The main issue arises from misapplying the properties of square roots, particularly regarding the sign of the result. It is clarified that while the steps taken are mathematically valid, they lead to extraneous solutions due to the nature of square roots. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering absolute values when dealing with square roots in complex numbers. Overall, the error lies in the incorrect interpretation of the square root's sign.
expscv
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
4 = \sqrt {4*4} = \sqrt {4*4*i^4} =\sqrt {i^2*4 *4*i^2}

= i\sqrt{4}*i\sqrt{4} =2i*2i =-4

this is wrong but which setp
=)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't even have to go through that much work.

4 = \sqrt{16} = -4

cookiemonster
 
That should be:
4 = |\sqrt {4*4}| = |\sqrt {4*4*i^4}| = |\sqrt {i^2*4 *4*i^2}|
= |i\sqrt{4}*i\sqrt{4}| = |2i*2i| = |-4|
Or just:
4 = |\sqrt{16}| = |-4|
 
hehe oh? i was told that it sippose to be wrong
in somewhere that i forgot.
 
Well, it's wrong in that you're taking the wrong sign in front of the square root, but that's about it. Squares and square roots tend to generate extra solutions that are not necessarily correct. This is one such case.

cookiemonster
 
yep i agree, i remmber now haha
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top