Bhabha Scattering: Why Only Two Leading Order Diagrams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gamma5772
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
gamma5772
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I don't understand why in Bhabha scattering (e+ e- -> e+ e-) why there are only two leading order Feynman diagrams. It seems to me like there should be s, t, and u-channel diagrams. Could someone explain why I am wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually there is only one diagram. If the reaction in the s-channel is AB → CD (e+ e- → e+ e-) then the reaction in the t-channel is ACBD (e+ e- → e+ e-) and both of these contribute to Bhabha scattering. But the reaction in the u-channel is Moller scattering: AD → CB (e+ e+ → e+ e+).
 
Sorry if I'm being slow, but the attached Feynman diagram seems to be a u-channel diagram for the reaction e+ e- -> e+ e-.

(Apologies -- I don't know how to make Feynman diagrams in latex)
 

Attachments

  • uchannel.png
    uchannel.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 600
! "Crossing" does not mean that the lines literally cross over one another. The diagram is just rotated, so that one or more legs move from a past direction to a future direction, or vice versa.
 
Oh my. This is embarrassing -- I thought for a minute the diagram I just drew was distinct from the other two!

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top