Bianchi Models and Kantowski-Sachs

  • Thread starter Thread starter utku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Models
AI Thread Summary
Bianchi models and Kantowski-Sachs models are both homogeneous and isotropic cosmologies, but they differ in their symmetry groups. Bianchi models have a 3-parameter symmetry group, indicating a simple transitive action where one symmetry operation maps any point to another without further rotation. In contrast, Kantowski-Sachs models feature a 4-parameter symmetry group, allowing for rotations about a fixed axis, thus making the symmetry multiply transitive. The distinction lies in the nature of their symmetry operations, with Bianchi being anisotropic and Kantowski-Sachs incorporating additional rotational symmetry. This understanding clarifies the mathematical definitions and implications of these cosmological models.
utku
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
What are main differencies between Bianchi models and Kantowski-Sachs models.
Can anyone give mathematical definition clearly and possibly simple form?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Both Bianchi and Kantowski-Sachs cosmologies are homogeneous and isotropic. Hiomogeneous means that for each space section, there's a symmetry operation that maps any point P into any other point Q. Bianchi cosmologies are simply transitive, meaning that there's only one symmetry mapping P into Q. Consequently for Bianchi types the symmetry groups are 3-parameter groups. There are nine different types, corresponding to the nine different types of 3-parameter Lie algebras.
[/PLAIN]
Kantowski-Sachs
is an example of a homogeneous, isotropic universe with a symmetry group that is multiply transitive. It has a 4-parameter group: SO(3) x R, rotations on a sphere and translations along an axis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply.
I think you want to say homogeneous and anisotropic spaces.
 
Thanks Bill_K,

Can you express more explicitly the term 3-parameters and 4-parameters groups please?

thanks.
 
utku said:
I think you want to say homogeneous and anisotropic spaces.
Yes, I meant ANisotropic, in both places! :redface: Thanks!

utku said:
Can you express more explicitly the term 3-parameters and 4-parameters groups please?
The number of parameters in a group is the number of variables you need to specify to pick out a particular group element. For example the usual group of 3-d rotations acting on a sphere S - you can rotate the North pole P into any other point Q on the sphere, and you must give the latitude and longitude of Q - that's two parameters. But after doing that, you can still rotate through some angle ψ about Q, keeping Q fixed. That's a total of three parameters. And the group action on S is multiply transitive - since ψ can be anything, there are many group elements that map P into Q.

The space section of a Bianchi cosmology has a 3-parameter symmetry group, because you can map P into any other point Q, and this time Q needs three coordinates to label it - x, y, z for example. And there is no further symmetry, you can't rotate about Q due to the anisotropy. So the action is simply transitive.

The Kantowski-Sachs cosmology has one more parameter - there's a symmetry axis at each point, so you can hold Q fixed and rotate through angle ψ about this axis - making it multiply transitive.
 
Thanks Bill_K,
Your answer is very usefull for me. I understood many of your reply :)
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top