Bianry to polynomial conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rubik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Rubik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
How do you convert binary into polynomial form? I understand hexadecial conversion so {4e} = 01001000 now how do I go about changing that into a polynomial?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you're talking about polynomials, you're referring to polynomials over GF(2)? If so, isn't it just a matter of assigning each bit as a coefficient of a power of x (or whatever variable)? For instance,
D_{16} = 1101_2 = x^3 + x^2 + 1
?
(Assuming the binary number was written MS bit-first.)
 
Rubik said:
How do you convert binary into polynomial form? I understand hexadecial conversion so {4e} = 01001000 now how do I go about changing that into a polynomial?
Numbers are NOT polynomials so you don't- not without saying exactly how you are associating each number with a specific polynomial as eumyang says.
 
Are you talking about binary representations of floating-points?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top