Why is Biasing Important for Photodetectors?

AI Thread Summary
Biasing photodetectors is crucial for optimizing their performance, particularly in fiber optics applications where light signals are converted to electrical signals. It enhances the sensitivity and response time of the photodetector, allowing for better detection of weak signals. The specific biasing voltage can vary depending on the type of photodetector used, such as photodiodes. Proper biasing ensures that the photodetector operates in its ideal region, improving signal integrity before it reaches the PNA. Understanding the specific requirements and characteristics of the photodetector is essential for effective biasing.
eahaidar
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Hello
I just want to ask why do we bias the photodetector before starting any setup?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be a little more specific? What kind of photodetector? What is it biased to?
 
So I am working in fiber optics and I will convert light signals to electric signals such that the PNA detects them before the PNA there is a photodetector just want to know why should I bias it before time
Thanks
 
I'm not very familiar with fiber optics. What kind of photodetector are you using?
 
Try starting with the WIKIPEDIA page for an inroduction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodiode

Be sure to study it carefully, visit the "see also" entries, check out each "reference" that covers your specific interests, and don't ignore "external links". Here is just one of those:
http://www.hamamatsu.com/us/en/community/optical_sensors/tutorials/products/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top