Biehle's Nova Physics page 3 error with volume calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential error in the volume calculation for 0.4 kg of oxygen gas at specified temperature and pressure in the Nova Physics textbook. The textbook arrives at a volume of 24 L, while users consistently calculate around 25 L or 25.6 L using the ideal gas law. A key point of confusion is the transition from a denominator of 32x12 to 8x50 in the textbook's calculations, which some believe may indicate a misprint. Adjustments for rounding and different gas constant values also contribute to the discrepancies in results. Overall, participants suggest that the textbook's final calculation may be incorrect.
thatrunner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all vbles and given/known data

So I'm going throught the Nova Physics book and I'm wondering if there's a mistake in calculation. The question reads: How much volume does 0.4kg of oxygen gas take up at T= 27 degrees Celsius and P= 12 atm (gas constant R = 0.0821 L atm/ K Mol).



Homework Equations



V= nRT/ P
the text's last two steps for this calculation are: 0.4x1000x0.08x300 / 32 x 12
the last calculation is: 4x8x300 / 8x50 giving an answer of 24 L.
Where on Earth did the 8x50 denominator come from?


The Attempt at a Solution



I keep coming up with 25L, but the textbook calculates the volume to be 24L.


Thanks in advance for any help offered :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thatrunner said:
1. The problem statement, all vbles and given/known data

So I'm going throught the Nova Physics book and I'm wondering if there's a mistake in calculation. The question reads: How much volume does 0.4kg of oxygen gas take up at T= 27 degrees Celsius and P= 12 atm (gas constant R = 0.0821 L atm/ K Mol).



Homework Equations



V= nRT/ P
the text's last two steps for this calculation are: 0.4x1000x0.08x300 / 32 x 12
the last calculation is: 4x8x300 / 8x50 giving an answer of 24 L.
Where on Earth did the 8x50 denominator come from?


The Attempt at a Solution



I keep coming up with 25L, but the textbook calculates the volume to be 24L.


Thanks in advance for any help offered :)
It may be a rounding problem. I get 25.6 litres.

If you want to use V = nRT/P you have to use R = 8.3145 Nm/mol K and P in Pascals (N/m) with 1 atm = 101,325 N/m. Volume will be in m^3 so multiply by 1000 to get litres

n = 400g/(32 g/mol) = 12.5 mol
P = 12 x 101,325 = 1,215,900 N/m
T = 300 K
R = 8.3145 J/mol K

V = 1000 x 12.5 x 8.3145 x 300/1.216e6 = 25.6 L.

AM
 
Thanks Andrew for taking the time to respond.
Yes, without rounding off the initial figures, I come up with an answer of 25.6 L.
The last stage in calculations in the book confused me when it moved from having a 32x12 denominator to a denominator of 8x50... I think the last step contains a misprint.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top