Big anaconda orbiting the planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul-g
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a large anaconda orbiting planet XYZ-123 in a vertical position. When the anaconda folds into a compact form, it raises questions about the nature of its orbit, specifically whether it remains circular or begins to recede from the planet. Participants explore the conservation of angular momentum and the implications of changing the anaconda's radius on its orbital characteristics. The calculations involve gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, suggesting that the orbit will not remain circular due to the work done during the folding process. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the anaconda moving to a larger radius or distancing itself from the planet.
paul-g
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Big anaconda orbiting the planet XYZ-123 in a vertical position (along the radius of the planet and at a constant height). At some point, anaconda folded her in a small bundle. Is its orbit will be circular? He begins to recede from or approach the planet?


2. The attempt at a solution

I know that the anaconda was able to perform the action described in the command have to do some work. It seems to me that it would start by moving away from the planet, but I do not know how to prove it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is angular momentum conserved?
 
There is no information about it, but I think yes.
 
Why not choose some numbers for an example and work out a figure for the angular momentum of the snake stretched out (so going from say, radius r1 to radius r2). Then determine at what radius the compact body would want to orbit with that same angular momentum. Compare this and that. :smile:
 
I thought to write it this way

E_{p}=-\frac{GMm}{r}

F=ma

\frac{GMm}{r^2}=\frac{mv^2}{r}

\frac{mv^2}{2}=\frac{GMm}{2r}

E_{k}=-\frac{E_{p}}{2}

E=E_{k}+E_{p}=\frac{GMm}{2r}-\frac{GMm}{r}

E=-\frac{GMm}{2r}



This applies to the circular orbit, but in our case:

E_{k}=E_{k_{1}}-W

E=E_{k_{1}}-W+E_{p}

How to prove that the orbit is not circular. This is enough? Snake gave up and will be circulated in the orbit of larger radius, or begin to move away from the planet?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top