When Did Gravity Separate from Other Forces After the Big Bang?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity is believed to have separated from the primordial 'superforce' almost simultaneously with the Big Bang, but a specific time frame remains unknown. General Relativity treats gravity differently than the other forces, complicating the understanding of their separation. Quantum mechanics effectively describes electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces, but does not incorporate gravity, which becomes significant in high-density scenarios like black holes and the early universe. The challenge lies in developing a unified theory that reconciles General Relativity and quantum mechanics without breaking down in extreme conditions. Currently, there are no promising solutions to this fundamental problem in physics.
benk99nenm312
Messages
302
Reaction score
0
At the point of the big bang, when did gravity split off from the other forces? How many seconds in (i.e. 10^-30 seconds or something like that)? I've been curious as to how the forces split; I was hoping for a specific number here, but I never found one.

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is believed gravity split from the primordial 'superforce' almost simultaneously with the big bang. See Neil Tyson's discussion here
http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/category/subjects/bigbang
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no known answer to the question, because as far as General Relativity is concerned, gravity is not a force, and operates in a fundamentally different way to the 'other' forces.

We have two theories, quantum mechanics and associated field theories work very well at describing the electromagnetic, weakd and stronge forces, but only if you ignore gravity. This is usually okay, since if you are talking about the interaction of some particles, their mutual gravity is so small as to be ignorable. On the other hand, when gravity is important, such as in the orbits of planets, galaxies etc etc, all the other forces are miniscule, so you can just worry about gravity and use General Relativity instead of quantum mechanics.

The problem arises when gravity and other forces are of comparable strength, this require large densities (to make gravity strong) so is a problem for black holes and the early Universe. In theses regimes, the only answer is that we don't know. Coming up with a suitable single theory that looks like GR in the places were we now use GR, and QM in places we now use QM but that also doesn't break down for black holes and the early universe is one of the holy grails of modern physics, and there are no good indications that we are close to success at this stage.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
266
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
661
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top