I Big rip - order of distintegration?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter janq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big rip Rip
AI Thread Summary
In the big rip scenario, galaxies are expected to dissipate first due to their relatively weak gravitational binding compared to denser structures. While gravity initially holds massive objects together, the tenuous gravity among stars in galaxies makes them more susceptible to disintegration. As dark energy overcomes gravity, it ultimately leads to the breakdown of even the strong nuclear forces within atomic nuclei. This scenario is now considered less plausible due to advancements in understanding cosmological expansion. The discussion highlights the complex interplay between gravity and dark energy in the context of cosmic disintegration.
janq
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the big rip scenario, many of the documentaries and explanations have always said that galaxies would dissipate first. Why is that? wouldn't everything go at once? or is it because galaxies require the most amount of gravity to keep it together
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The big rip is not generally considered a plausible scenario any more,since we now have a better understanding of cosmological expansion.
However I think the general idea is that gravity would at first hold more massive objects together,
While galaxies are big they are not very dense, the gravity holding the individual stars of as galaxy together is tenuous.
By contrast the gravity holding the atoms together in a star is stronger, but very local to the star.
The final outcome in that scenario is that dark energy having defeated gravity eventually goes on to defeat even the strong nuclear force holding atomic nuclei together.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top