Bijection between products of countable sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter The1TL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection Sets
The1TL
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let S1 = {a} be a set consisting of just one element and let
S2 = {b, c} be a set consisting of two elements.

Show that S1 × Z is bijective to S2 × Z.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I usually prove bijectivity by showing that two sets are equinumerous, But in this case S1 and S2 are not so that makes it more difficult.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, this problem demonstrates how things can become unintuitive when dealing with infinite sets. If A were any nonempty finite set, this claim would be false, since in that case
<br /> |S_1 \times A| = |S_1||A| = |A|<br />
<br /> |S_2 \times A| = |S_2||A| = 2|A| \; .<br />

However, since \mathbb{Z} is infinite, we have more leeway. Can you think of a proper subset of \mathbb{Z} that is equinumerous to \mathbb{Z}?
 
here is one idea:

...
...
(a,-3) <--> (c,-2)
(a,-2) <--> (b,-1)
(a,-1) <--> (c,-1)
(a,0) <--> (b,0)
(a,1) <--> (c,0)
(a,2) <--> (b,1)
(a,3) <--> (c,1)
(a,4) <--> (b,2)
...
...

can you prove this is, in fact, a bijection?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top