Programs Bioengineering, Biochemist, Molecular Biology & Nanotechnology: Majors & Jobs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leinad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    biochemist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the distinctions between bioengineering, biochemistry, molecular biology, and nanotechnology. Bioengineering involves modifying biological systems, such as enhancing crop yields through genetic modifications. Biochemistry focuses on the chemical processes within living organisms, although specific job roles in this field were less defined. Molecular biology was mentioned as a related area of interest, particularly in the context of genetic sciences, which typically requires a strong foundation in chemistry and biology. Nanotechnology is highlighted as an interdisciplinary field with applications in various scientific domains, including bioengineering. The conversation emphasizes that one's major does not strictly dictate career paths, and there is a suggestion that pursuing a minor in nanotechnology could complement a bioengineering focus. Overall, the discussion underscores the importance of a solid educational background in chemistry and biology for those interested in these fields.
Leinad
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have a few questions as to the differences in some specific fields along with majoring differences. Can you please help me describe some sample jobs, and correct me on my descriptions.

Bioengineering: modifying the genetic structure to give certain characterics to i.e. plants.
Sample job could be working in lab on rice plants to increase the amount of havests in a crop cycle.

Biochemist: Observing the chemical reactions in biological lifeforms, i.e. when a human becomes angry - what type of chemicals are released.
Sample Job: eh... I dunno

Also wanted to find some more about molecular biologists, and about the nanotechnology.

I think it'd be sweet to go into nanotechnology - maybe even a minor would fill me up (would nano help with a bioengineering or something?). Right now bioengineering, from my understanding, looks very appealing. Anyone's take on any of this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Genetics --> Genome Sciences or a similar name. But it's not uncommon to see a biologist or biochemist doing research relevant to this. "Your major is not your career."

Biochemistry is chemistry as it applies to biology. You seem to more or less have that down. It's a little broader than that, but you've got the rough idea.

Bioengineering is actually not as well-defined yet as it is usually a relatively new program, so you will need to look at the specific curriculum. Generally this involves engineering devices relevant to biological and medical applications, or engineering things like assistive devices or artificial organs.

Nanotechnology is highly interdisciplinary, but tends to incorporate a lot of chemistry and physics. It has plenty of potential applications to a wide array of things, so you will see some people in the fields you're interested in researching it or researching uses of it.
 
Alright, this is very helpful. We've all seen the discovery channel or whatever it is. So genetic major, or genome sciences is more of alter genetic structures to the example I mentioned earlier?
 
Discovery channel?

Genome sciences is not usually an undergraduate major. I would hazard, never. You should have a strong background in chemistry (at least through OChem & lab) and biology (at least a year of "for majors" biology requiring chemistry, and probably some topics courses) if that's what you want to pursue.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
16K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top