Biology (translation) extremely confused, final is tomorrow

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mutated DNA sequence and the confusion regarding the resulting amino acid sequence. The original DNA sequence was mutated, leading to a question about the corresponding amino acids. The participant initially misinterpreted the reading direction of the mRNA, which should be from 5' to 3', ultimately arriving at the correct answer, C (ser-ser-leu). The clarification emphasizes that the question provides the coding strand, and understanding the context of whether the sequence is coding or non-coding is crucial for accurate translation. This highlights the importance of carefully reading the wording in biology questions to determine the correct approach for transcription and translation.
SA32
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



8) Suppose the following DNA sequence was mutated from 5'-AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGA to

5'-AGAAGAGAGATCGAGAGA. What amino acid sequence will be generated based on this mutated DNA?

A) glu-arg-glu-leu-leu-leu

B) ser-leu-ser-leu-ser-leu

C) ser-ser-leu

D) leu-phe-arg-glu-glu-glu

E) arg-glu-arg-glu-arg-glu


The Attempt at a Solution


DNA template strand: 5' AGA - AGA - GAG - ATC - GAG - AGA 3'
mRNA strand: 3' UCU - UCU - CUC - UAG - CUC - UCU 5'

But ribosomes read mRNA in the 5' to 3' direction.

mRNA strand: 5' UCU - CUC - GAU - CUC - UCU - UCU 3'
protein: ser - leu - asp - leu - ser - ser

But this isn't one of the choices.

I get C (ser ser leu) if I read from 3' to 5', because UAG is a stop codon, but I'm staring at a video that shows a ribosome reading the mRNA strand 5' to 3'. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on wording on the question, you have to assume that the sequence they give you is the sequence that will be translated and not it's complementary sequence.

Essentially the question gives you the coding strand and not the anti-coding/non-coding strand. Transcription from DNA to RNA is made using the non-coding strand.

C is the right answer.

For future reference, look at the wording of the sentence, if anti-coding/non-coding sequence is ever used, the question is asking you to create the complementary strand before starting translation. If coding strand present or non-coding strand is absent, you don't need to create the complementary strand.

This is not fast and steady rule but it hold true most of the time.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top