Black body radiation and the derivation of Stefan Boltzman

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on black body radiation and the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, participants clarify the conversion of the variable of integration from dλ to dx. It is established that dλ is not equal to dx, and the relationship λ = a/x is introduced, where a is a constant. The differential of this relationship leads to the conclusion that dλ equals -(a/x^2)dx. This highlights the importance of correctly substituting variables in integration to maintain accuracy in calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for precision in mathematical derivations related to physical laws.
dcarmichael
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The total intensity i(t) radiated from a blackbody is given by the integral from 0 to infinity of all wavelengths of the Planck distribution.But I keep seem to be getting the wrong answer. Could someone point out where I'm going wrong
Relevant Equations
Let l=lambda I(l,T)=(2Pihc^2)/l^5 *1/(e^(hc/lkT)-1)
20191102_144741.jpg
20191102_144734.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you replace dλ with when converting to x as the variable of integration?
 
haruspex said:
What did you replace dλ with when converting to x as the variable of integration?
I didnt indicate it but dλ is replaced with dx since x is new variable of integration
 
dcarmichael said:
I didnt indicate it but dλ is replaced with dx since x is new variable of integration
##d\lambda \neq dx##

Note that you can write ##\lambda = \large \frac{a}{x}##, where ##a## is a constant. Taking the differential of both sides of this relation, you should get ##d\lambda = \boxed ?\, dx##. What goes inside the box?
 
TSny said:
##d\lambda \neq dx##

Note that you can write ##\lambda = \large \frac{a}{x}##, where ##a## is a constant. Taking the differential of both sides of this relation, you should get ##d\lambda = \boxed ?\, dx##. What goes inside the box?
dλ= -(a/x^2)dx
 
Ok. Go for it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top