Black hole evaporation, where does it all go?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes are theorized to evaporate through Hawking radiation, which involves the emission of particles as they lose mass. Smaller black holes evaporate faster due to their higher temperatures, as their surface gravity increases inversely with their size. There is no critical mass that prevents black holes from evaporating, including supermassive ones. White holes, which are theorized opposites of black holes, currently lack observational evidence. The discussion emphasizes the need for a quantum gravity theory to fully understand these processes.
Geordie Ross
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I hear that black holes evaporate, but does it all get converted into Hawkins radiation? And what role do white holes play in evaporation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I hear that black holes evaporate, but does it all get converted into Hawkins radiation?
Hawking.
Probably yes, but a theory of quantum gravity is needed to study that in detail. As the black hole gets hotter and hotter, it begins to emit heavier particles, in addition to the photons.
And what role do white holes play in evaporation?
There are no indications that white holes exist.
 
Thanks, and is it true that the smaller the black hole, the faster it evaporates? And is there a critical mass that prevents super massive black holes from evaporating?
 
Geordie Ross said:
Thanks, and is it true that the smaller the black hole, the faster it evaporates? And is there a critical mass that prevents super massive black holes from evaporating?
Yes, smaller black holes radiate at higher temperatures. The Hawking temperature is directly proportional to the surface gravity, \kappa, of the object, T = \kappa/2\pi. As the black hole shrinks, its surface gravity goes up (proportional to 1/R^2_S, where R_S the Schwarzschild radius) and, hence, so does its temperature.

There is no critical mass that prevents black holes from evaporating.
 
Thank you for the detailed replies, my curiosity is temporarily quenched!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top