I Black Hole Stability Conjecture: Why Is It Important?

Suzanne Rosenzweig
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am working on a presentation for a course in general relativity and my topic is the stability of black holes. In many of the references and articles that I have found, the author asserts the importance of the conjecture but offers no reason. So I ask: Why is the black hole stability conjecture so important? Any information and references provided will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suzanne Rosenzweig said:
In many of the references and articles that I have found, the author asserts the importance of the conjecture but offers no reason.

Can you give some specific examples?
 
In astrophysics when they talk and study black holes they mean the Kerr solution. If it is not stable a lot of the results will have to be at least revisited, especially if the rigidity conjecture turns out to be false. From a mathematical point of view it is also interesting to settle the question, one way or the other. The only other such result is the stability of Minkowski (of course there are other stability results but this is essentially the only one).

You can find some of the talks of Klainerman on black holes, he usually talks about the importance of the conjecture.

 
  • Like
Likes Auto-Didact and Suzanne Rosenzweig
Suzanne Rosenzweig said:
I am working on a presentation for a course in general relativity and my topic is the stability of black holes. In many of the references and articles that I have found, the author asserts the importance of the conjecture but offers no reason. So I ask: Why is the black hole stability conjecture so important? Any information and references provided will be greatly appreciated!

A non-technical reference:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/to-test-einsteins-equations-poke-a-black-hole-20180308/

It might be possible to use this to track down some useful technical references.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
martinbn said:
In astrophysics when they talk and study black holes they mean the Kerr solution. If it is not stable a lot of the results will have to be at least revisited, especially if the rigidity conjecture turns out to be false. From a mathematical point of view it is also interesting to settle the question, one way or the other. The only other such result is the stability of Minkowski (of course there are other stability results but this is essentially the only one).

You can find some of the talks of Klainerman on black holes, he usually talks about the importance of the conjecture.



Thank you very much for your response! Yes, ideally I will discuss Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions to Einstein's equations, citing works by Regge and Wheeler, Vishveshwara, Zerilli, Wald and Kay, etc. Also, I greatly appreciate your sharing a resource. I will look into the rigidity conjecture and check out Klainerman's lectures. :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top