Black Holes: Volume & Forces Explored

Invutil
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Do black hole singularities have 0 volume? What forces are keeping the particles from being in the same place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Invutil said:
What forces are keeping the particles from being in the same place?
If there is a singularity, none, and a singularity has a volume of 0 (otherwise it wouldn't be a singularity, at least not in our universe).
It is unclear if there is a singularity, as we don't have a proper unification of quantum physics and general relativity, and there both are relevant at the same time.
 
We just had a discussion of this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...s-equal-to-schwarzschild-radius.841320/unread

The brief answer is that in classical relativity, a singularity is not part of the spacetime manifold. It's not a point or a set of points. There is not even any straightforward way to define whether it's one-dimensional, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional. We certainly can't say whether or not it has volume, because that would require the use of the metric, and a singularity represents a breakdown of the metric.

This may be helpful: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/boundary-construction-for-of-b-h-and-b-b-singularities.833399/

mfb said:
If there is a singularity, none, and a singularity has a volume of 0 (otherwise it wouldn't be a singularity, at least not in our universe).

This is wrong, for the reasons given above.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
Hmm, right. It's probably better to say its volume is not well-defined.
 
mfb said:
Hmm, right. It's probably better to say its volume is not well-defined.

I would just say that there's no "it" whose volume we could even try to define. Classical GR doesn't describe a singularity as a physical or geometrical thing. Asking for physical characteristics of a singularity is like asking what time it is when the tip of the minute hand is at the center of the clock. The dial only exists around the circumference of the circle, not at its center. You might think that a black hole's mass, charge, and spin were properties attributable to the singularity, but GR doesn't actually describe them this way; they're properties of the whole spacetime that are only defined by an observer at asymptotic infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz, Smattering and mfb
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top