Are Black Holes Destroying Our Galaxy? The Truth About Galaxies and Black Holes

In summary: Well, if you're going to insist on being logical about it... :tongue:In summary, the conversation discusses the effects of black holes in the universe and if they pose a threat to our galaxy and its inhabitants. The experts state that black holes do not have the power to suck everything in and that most matter will simply miss the black holes. They also mention that the process of matter accreting into black holes is very slow and will take an extremely long time to affect the universe. Additionally, they discuss the possibility of black holes radiating and shrinking in the far future, resulting in diffuse radiation. Finally, they address the fear and mortality that can come with contemplating the vastness and complexity of the cosmos.
  • #1
GreatEscapist
180
0
I'm sure this is a stupid and/or already asked question. But I don't do astronomy.
If every galaxy has a black hole, and black holes suck everything in, does this mean that our galaxy is being slowly destroyed by black holes? (Everything just keeps getting sucked in) And if so, are we going to die due to the massive gravitational pull, eventually? Or are the black holes, like, inactive or something? (can black holes BE inactive?)
And if this is all true, how come everything isn't already gone? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Hi GreatEscapist! Welcome to PF! :smile:

No, black holes have no sucky-power.

Matter crashes into a black hole in exactly the same way that it crashes into a star of the same mass …

the only difference is that the event horizon of a black hole is slightly smaller than a star of the same mass, so there's more chance of the matter whizzing by and escaping! :wink:
 
  • #3


tiny-tim said:
the only difference is that the event horizon of a black hole is slightly smaller than a star of the same mass, so there's more chance of the matter whizzing by and escaping! :wink:
Heh, slightly? Yeah, you're understating that just a little...the event horizon of a black hole the mass of our own Sun would be about 3km in radius. Our Sun's current radius is 700,000km. So yeah, most matter just misses black holes.
 
  • #4
Sucky-power! LOL
 
  • #5
GreatEscapist said:
If every galaxy has a black hole, and black holes suck everything in, does this mean that our galaxy is being slowly destroyed by black holes? :

The key word in this statement is "slowly". It's true that more and more of the mass of the universe is falling into black holes as time goes on. However, the time for this to happen is extremely long, far longer than the current lifetime of the universe. Long, long before this will happen, we have other things to worry about, such as the sun expanding into a red giant and consuming the earth.
 
  • #6
phyzguy said:
The key word in this statement is "slowly". It's true that more and more of the mass of the universe is falling into black holes as time goes on. However, the time for this to happen is extremely long, far longer than the current lifetime of the universe. Long, long before this will happen, we have other things to worry about, such as the sun expanding into a red giant and consuming the earth.

There are such things as gravitationally unbounded systems. So no, even given infinite time, a black hole will not accrete everything.
 
  • #7
Nabeshin said:
There are such things as gravitationally unbounded systems. So no, even given infinite time, a black hole will not accrete everything.
Over very large time spans, nearly everything will eventually run into one or decay. We're talking around 10^40 years for this to happen, though, so yeah, a long way off:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe
 
  • #8
Chalnoth said:
Over very large time spans, nearly everything will eventually run into one or decay. We're talking around 10^40 years for this to happen, though, so yeah, a long way off:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe

From the same link:

Wikipedia said:
The end result is that most objects are ejected from the galaxy, leaving a small fraction (perhaps 1% to 10%) which fall into the central supermassive black hole.

So much more matter will simply go off and decay in the middle of nowhere than will be consumed by the black holes.
 
  • #9
Once central galactic black holes suck in all immediate matter in the area, everything will for the most part, become stable. There are I think 10 or so stars observed orbiting our central black hole, and are all in a relatively stable orbit. I will see if I can find the data.
 
  • #11
Chalnoth said:
Heh, slightly? Yeah, you're understating that just a little...the event horizon of a black hole the mass of our own Sun would be about 3km in radius. Our Sun's current radius is 700,000km. So yeah, most matter just misses black holes.

Hi Chalnoth! :smile:

I was thinking more of comparison with a neutron star …

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star" …
A typical neutron star has a mass between 1.35 and about 2.1 solar masses, with a corresponding radius of about 12 km if the Akmal-Pandharipande-Ravenhall (APR) Equation of state (EOS) is used.

… so a neutron star of the same mass would have about 4 times the radius of a black hole, which is nearer "slightly" than about 200,000. :wink:
graybass said:
Sucky-power! LOL

Hi graybass! :smile:

I always use that word, because I honestly can't think of anything more sensible. :rolleyes:

"Attraction" won't do, since gravity attracts anyway … I need a word that suggests more that the average atttractiveness … a sort of go-out-and-getishness rather than a just-lying-in-wait-ishness. :biggrin:

Hence "sucky-power" ! o:)​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Fair enough :)
 
  • #13
I would add, that from the point of view of a poor sucker in the FAAAAR future... into black holes, or ejected to decay, is 6 of one, a half dozen of the other. Given time, BHs will start to slooowly radiate, shrink, and radiate faster. The end result (should) be the same... diffuse radiation.

Kinda kills the notion of immortality as "desirable" doesn't it?
 
  • #14
I feel so mortal now.
Black holes makes me feel so tiny...and scared. :frown:
 
  • #15
GreatEscapist said:
I feel so mortal now.
Black holes makes me feel so tiny...and scared. :frown:

Cosmology has a way of doing that. :wink:

EDIT: All kidding aside, if you're being at all serious, there is no reason to be afraid. As others have said, they don't present a particular threat, and is thinking about the end of the cosmos as we know REALLY any more terrifying than contemplating your own death? I find that imponderables tend to evoke similar reactions of dread and fear. Recognize it, and be free to pursue a good and ethical life as best you can. After all, nothing matters except that it effects the living, and absolutes only exist if you believe in them (or by some chance, there is a deity(s)) and want to follow them. For the rest, concern yourself with the living, the present, and the future you CAN effect... the rest is for later, or not (and we'll find out... or not).
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Yeah, I guess that's all I can do.
Black/white holes are so friggin interesting.
 

What is a blackhole and how is it formed?

A blackhole is a region in space where the gravitational pull is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. It is formed when a massive star collapses upon itself, creating a singularity with infinite density and zero volume.

How do blackholes affect their surroundings?

Blackholes have a strong gravitational pull that can affect the motion of nearby objects. They also emit powerful radiation which can impact the surrounding space and objects.

What is the relationship between blackholes and galaxies?

Blackholes are often found at the center of galaxies, including our own Milky Way. They play a crucial role in the formation and evolution of galaxies, as their gravitational pull can influence the motion of stars and gas within the galaxy.

Can anything escape from a blackhole?

Once an object crosses the event horizon of a blackhole, it cannot escape. However, objects that are outside the event horizon can still escape the gravitational pull of a blackhole if they have enough speed and momentum.

What is the difference between a blackhole and a wormhole?

A blackhole is a singularity in space, while a wormhole is a hypothetical tunnel or shortcut through space-time. While blackholes are formed by the collapse of a massive star, wormholes are purely theoretical and have not been proven to exist.

Similar threads

B Does a contracting universe destroy its black holes?
    • Cosmology
Replies
29
Views
2K
B What fraction of the matter in the universe is in black holes?
    • Cosmology
Replies
15
Views
2K
I How can black holes with varying masses have the same extreme characteristics?
    • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
1K
A four foot diameter black hole destroys our Sun
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
25
Views
406
I Why Do Galaxies Spin? Exploring the Science Behind It
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
B Questions regarding expansion, the vacuum in space, and black holes
    • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Question regarding supermassive black holes in the early Universe
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Big Bang, result of black hole?
    • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
3K
Black Holes & Life: Myth or Reality?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Quantum tunnel into becoming solid iron
    • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top