Boltzmann Distribution and microstate probabilities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of microstate probabilities within the canonical ensemble framework. It establishes that while all microstates of a composite system (system plus heat bath) are equally probable, the microstates of the system alone exhibit varying probabilities based on energy levels. The relationship between the entropy of the system and the heat bath is defined mathematically, leading to the conclusion that the probability of the system occupying a specific energy state is proportional to the number of microstates available at that energy. Key equations include the total number of microstates and the probability expression involving energy and entropy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical ensemble theory
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of entropy and its mathematical representation
  • Basic proficiency in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the canonical ensemble probability distribution
  • Explore the relationship between entropy and temperature in thermodynamic systems
  • Learn about the implications of microstate probabilities in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of heat baths and their role in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and entropy analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of microstate probabilities in canonical ensembles.

I_laff
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
For a canonical ensemble the probability of occupying a certain microstate varies depending on the energy, however I thought that every microstate has an equal chance of being occupied. So what part of the canonical ensemble have I misunderstood?
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you were to consider the system plus the environment, you would find that all microstates of the total are still equally probable. But when you focus on the system only, you finds that some of its microstates are more probable than others.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I_laff
One common way to motivate the canonical ensemble is to consider the system of interest to be placed into a much larger system, the "heat bath", with which it is allowed to exchange energy. Then if we let ##W(E)## be the number of microstates for the composite system with total energy ##E##, we can calculate it this way:

##W_{total}(E) = \sum_{\varepsilon} W_{hb}(E-\varepsilon) W_{s}(\varepsilon)##

where ##W_{hb}(E-\varepsilon)## is the number of microstates of the heat bath with energy ##E-\varepsilon## and ##W_s(\varepsilon)## is the number of microstates of the system of interest with energy ##\varepsilon##, and where ##W_{total}(E)## is the number of states of the composite system. Letting the entropy ##S## be defined via: ##S = k \ln W##, we have:

##e^{S_{total}/k} = \sum_{\varepsilon} e^{(S_{hb}(E - \varepsilon) + S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k}##

At this point, we assume that since the heat bath is much larger than the system of interest, most of the energy will be found in the heat bath. Then we can make the approximation:

##S_{hb}(E - \varepsilon) \approx S_{hb}(E) - \dfrac{\partial S_{hb}}{\partial E} \varepsilon##

Thermodynamically, ##\dfrac{\partial S_{hb}}{\partial E} \equiv \dfrac{1}{T_{hb}}## where ##T_{hb}## is the temperature of the heat bath. So we can write:

##e^{S_{total}/k} = e^{S_{hb}/k} \sum_{\varepsilon} e^{- \varepsilon/(kT)+ S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k}##

The probability of the small system having energy ##\varepsilon## (given that the total energy is ##E##) is proportional to the number of states of the composite system with total energy ##E## and subsystem energy ##\varepsilon##:

##P(E,\varepsilon) \propto e^{- \varepsilon/(kT)+ S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k} = e^{- (\varepsilon - S_{s} T)/(kT))}##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and anorlunda

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K