I Boltzmann equation and Hamiltonian

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Boltzmann equation in the context of dark matter (DM), specifically the relationship between the Liouville operator (L[f]) and the collision operator (C[f]). The Liouville operator incorporates the Hamiltonian, which accounts for potential energy and system interactions, while the collision operator addresses additional interactions not included in the Hamiltonian. There is confusion about whether the collision operator is solely for external interactions or if it can also represent self-interactions, such as dark matter annihilation. The conversation raises questions about the appropriate components to include in the Hamiltonian versus the collision operator, particularly regarding gravity and other forces like the weak force. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately modeling dark matter dynamics.
Malamala
Messages
342
Reaction score
28
Hello! I read today, in the context of DM, about the Boltzmann equation: $$L[f]=C[f]$$ where ##L[f]## is the Liouville operator (basically ##\frac{df}{dt}##), with ##f(x,v,t)## being the phase-space distribution of the system and ##C[f]## being the collision operator. I am a bit confused about how should I think about this in general. When you calculate ##L[f]## you use the Hamiltonian, which includes the potential energy, hence all the interactions of the system. Then, what does ##C[f]## account for? Initially I thought that it is used when you have an external system interacting with the original one. But in the context of DM, it seems that it can be a self interaction (DM annihilation for example). So, now I assume that you don't really put all your interactions in the Hamiltonian, but I am not sure. Do you just put the gravity in the case of DM? And treat other interactions (weak force for example) as part of the collision operator? And in general, what you add to the Hamiltonian and what to the collision operator? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
in the context of DM
DM = ... ?
 
jtbell said:
DM = ... ?
Dark Matter
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top