Boltzmann equation/ Statistical Mechanics

spaphy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If we assume entropy is a function of the multiplicity, \Omega, (S=k*f(\Omega)) show that that function f(\Omega) is ln(\Omega).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



\Omega can be written as N!/ni!. By using stirling's approximation, this becomes \Omega= ((N/e)^N)/((n1/e)^n1*(n2/e)^n2*...(ni/e)^ni). We know that the probability pi=N/ni so this reduces to W=1/(p1^n1*p2^n2*...*pi^ni). To make this user friendly take the log so ln(\Omega)=-\Sigmapi*ln(pi).

I just started down the road of trying to use definition of multiplicity and probabilities and I did get to ln(\Omega), but it doesn't seem like I'm really doing a solid proof and I'm not sure what's missing/ how to tie it together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider two systems, with entropies S1 and S2, multiplicities W1 and W2. What can you say about the entropy of the combined system? What can you say about the multiplicity of the combined system?
 
the total entropy s=s1+s2 and the multiplicity w=w1*w2. Is the log just out of convenience then?
 
No -- it's the only function that would fit the requirement that f(w1)+f(w2)=f(w1*w2).
 
Makes sense...thank you. It's been a long week. Nice to finally know where that log came from.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top